LO1 Discuss the rationale for the government intervention in the markets

MS50065E – Welfare Economics for Business Leaders

20 Credits 

Level 5

Academic Year 2024-25 

Copyright © 2024 University of West London

Permission granted to reproduce solely for the purpose of teaching and learning at the University of West London and its approved academic partners.

You are provided with study materials for your personal use only. You must not share these with others or upload them to websites. Any student who is found to have shared materials, particularly for personal gain, will be subject to disciplinary action if appropriate.

1.Team contact details

Module Leader

 

Email

 

Module Tutor

 

Email

 

Subject Librarian

 

Email

 

External Examiner

 

2.Module overview

Welcome to the course on Welfare Economics module.

This module explores the intricate connections between economic policies, welfare, and societal outcomes. We will focus on how welfare economics helps us understand the role of public policy in promoting social well-being. Welfare economics examines how economic activities and policies impact overall social welfare, particularly in addressing issues like inequality, poverty, and market failures. We will analyse how different policies, such as taxation, healthcare, and social security, affect income distribution and the well-being of various groups in society.

The course also considers public policy within a global context, addressing international challenges like climate change and economic inequality that require coordinated responses across borders. Ethical considerations are central to welfare economics, as policy decisions often involve trade-offs that impact fairness and justice. By the end of this course, you will have a solid foundation in welfare economics, enabling you to critically evaluate public policies and their broader social implications. You`ll be equipped to contribute thoughtfully to policy debates, understanding the complex interplay between economics, welfare, and society.

The main aims are:

  • To introduce the concept of welfare economics and its applications to businesses
  • To analyse the efficiency and equity implications of government interference in markets.
  • To examine various aspects of the economy in the context of welfare and taxation
  • To discuss the role of business in the formation of public policy

Indicative Content

Income Inequality, Public Policy for Fairness and Efficiency, Work, Wellbeing and Scarcity, Institution and Power, Market Failures, Public Policy and Behavioural Economics

Learning Outcomes Assessed

LO1 Discuss the rationale for the government intervention in the markets 

LO2 Examine how government spending and taxation affect aggregate demand and supply

LO3 Evaluate the outcomes of government stabilization policies designed to correct macroeconomic problems.

LO4 Apply knowledge of the seminal literature in the areas of public goods, externalities, public choice, and taxation

Please also refer to your Course Handbook for a detailed outline of how this module forms part of your course.

Expectations  

Specific expectations students can have of tutors:  

Guidance and support – Your tutor will provide you with academic guidance and will help you reflect on your academic progress so that you get the most out of your studies. Your tutor and student support team will also provide advice in the broader network of specialist student support services at the University to help you have the best possible experience during your studies.

Confidentiality – Some information may be sensitive. Although it may be necessary to consult colleagues, University staff will treat such information as confidential and limit disclosures to the minimum.

Assessment marks and summative feedback – Assessment marks and summative feedback will be given within 15 working days from the assessment submission deadline.

Specific expectations tutors will have of students:

Engagement – You are expected to attend lectures and seminars and be punctual. You will get the most out of your support by working with your tutor and student support team. This partnership is a two-way process, and by taking part in it fully, you will gain more benefits from your experience at the University. Therefore, you are expected to participate actively and engage in in-class activities and inform the tutor by email when and if you are unable to attend any classes.

Preparation – You are expected to read any preparation material/attempt any practice questions before the workshop as per the instructions given.

Professional conduct – You are expected to behave professionally in classes and not cause any disruption that might affect other students’ learning. You are also expected to communicate with your tutors professionally.

Attempt all assessments – You are expected to attempt all assessments by the submission deadline unless there are extenuating circumstances (in which case, please get in touch with the mitigation team before the assessment deadline).

Full attendance – Latecomers to the seminars may be admitted up to 1 hour after the start. Students who need to miss a class must email their tutor. Mobile phones are not to be used during seminars.

3.Preparing for your Assessment

A key part of your learning will be preparation for your summative assessment. You will be provided feedback on your formative assessments, and this will help you to better understand what is required of you when you submit your summative assessment. Please see below guidance on your formative assessment and how to access your feedback. 

Assessment Support

Assessment (insert below type of assessment as per the table above) 

Teaching Weeks in which Assessment Support Takes Place (enter each week no. in a new row) 

Outline of Type and Form of Assessment Support to be Provided  

Student Preparation Required Prior to or After the Support Session 

How will the Support Session to be Delivered 

 A1: Written assignment

 

Week 5

General Revision for Assessment 1 Objectives and

format

 No prior preparation

During the weekly seminar

 

Week 6

Formative feedback to be provided

Draft coursework

During the weekly seminar

 A2: Economic Plan

+ Pitching an idea

 

Week 12

General Revision for Assessment 2 Objectives and

format

 No prior preparation

During the weekly seminar

 

 

 

Week 13

Formative feedback to be

provided

Draft coursework

During the weekly seminar

Summative Assessments

Summative Assessment 1

Assessment title

Essay “Measuring Income Inequality”

Submission date and time

Week 7

Word Count (or equivalent)

1500 words max (an allowance of + or – 10% may be made)

Where to submit

Turnitin

Feedback date

Written feedback in 15 working days

Assessment Weighting

50%

Submitting, feedback & grades online using Blackboard

To assess inequality, economists often use a measure called the Gini coefficient. A measure of inequality of any quantity such as income or wealth, varying from a value of zero (if there is no inequality) to one (if a single individual receives all of it).

Instructions:

You are expected to produce an essay. You will need to access the following data.

  • Go to the Blackboard and download the Excel file containing the data
  • Choose two OECD countries (except the United Kingdom) that you would like to compare and filter the data so only the values for 1980 and 2014 are visible. Use this this data as the basis for your Lorenz curves.
  • Using a Gini coefficient calculator calculate the Gini coefficient for each of your Lorenz curves.
  • Calculate the 90/10 ratio of incomes for both countries
  • Go to the OECD website to access the data. The countries are ranked from smallest to largest Gini coefficient on the horizontal axis, and the vertical axis gives the Gini coefficient. 

Using your findings:

  1. Compare the distribution of income across time for each country.
  2. Compare the distribution of income across countries for each year (1980 and 2014).
  3. Suggest some explanations for any similarities and differences you observe. (You may want to research your chosen countries to see if there were any changes in government policy, political events, or other factors that may affect the income distribution.)
  4. Compare summary measures of inequality for all OECD countries on the OECD website. Compare inequality change over time using the World Inequality Database.

Source of data: 

Tips: How to start an essay?

A good plan of attack is necessary to achieve a successful essay. Your essay will normally consist of an analysis which presents a series of points, in the form of an argument. Avoid a narrative or chronological approach. It is important that you present appropriate evidence and detailed case studies, but make sure that these support substantive points of your analysis. Do not include a description just to fill space.

Think about the relevance of all parts of your essay to the question, and the logic of your conclusion. Sustained argument is essential to a successful essay. While showing awareness of different points of views, you should be able to do more than just present the opinions of others; you need to be able to show that you have developed your own view on the topic. Your essay should not consist simply of quotations and paraphrases from your reading.

In general terms, your essay will have an introduction, a ‘body’, and a conclusion: The introduction is where you explain why the set question is worth studying. Perhaps the period is one of significant change, whose impact is uncertain; or perhaps this is a question historians disagree about; or there may be a particular event (for example, a revolution) whose causes need explanation. These are just a few examples, but there are many others. Your introduction may be the place to state a hypothesis you will test, or even the thesis which you intend to prove. Alternatively, you may prefer to save your conclusions until the end. In the introduction, you may also: introduce key definitions;

summarise historical debate; and define your approach. Your introduction should not be too long, however — one to three paragraphs is a very rough guide. 

The body of the essay is where you present your analysis and evidence. The conclusion is usually a single paragraph stating what you have contributed to the historical problem you introduced on the first page. If you defined a hypothesis, say whether you disproved or confirmed it. Do not repeat all the points you have made in the essay but concentrate on the larger question. What are the implications of your findings, and what new questions arise from your findings?

You need to demonstrate critical analysis. A good analysis typically involves breaking a problem down into its component parts. Whatever comparison you choose, your analysis is likely to involve presenting evidence which supports an argument and other evidence which challenges it. (Hint: it is usually best to introduce contrary evidence first, before countering it with evidence in support of your argument).

Submission Criteria:

Your submission must meet all the following criteria. 

  1. A 1,500 words (+-10%) essay with all the requirements listed above (excluding Title page, Table of Contents, References and Appendix). 
  1. Submit the essay electronically on time via Turnitin by due date and time. 
  1. Submission type: Check and comply with the assessments schedule in your Module Study Guide (MSG). 
  1. Be adequately proofread prior to submission, and therefore the work does not contain significant errors of spelling and grammar. 
  1. Please maintain the similarity to below 30%. 
  1. Ensure that font style to be consistent (e.g., Arial or Times New Roman) and font size should be 12 for body text. Font size of headings and subheadings should be consistent as well. Please refer to those academic journal and economics reports you have read if you are not sure about the font and presentation.  
  1. Line spacing should be 1.5 and alignment should be justified. 
  1. Heading and subheadings should be numbered appropriately. 
  1. Reference of all research material and sources (excluded from the word count) 

Failure to meet any of the above criteria may result in a downward adjustment of the mark you are awarded; or disciplinary proceedings in the case of suspected plagiarism/cheating.

Main objectives of the Assessment

No.

Learning Outcome

Marking Criteria

1,3

Learning Outcomes Assessed

LO1 Discuss the rationale for the government intervention in the markets

LO3 Evaluate the outcomes of government stabilization policies designed to correct macroeconomic problems.

 

Assessment criteria

Maximum Marks

 

Knowledge and Understanding

30%

Application of Knowledge

40%

Analysis and Evaluation

20%

Referencing and Clarity

10%

Total

100%

 

 

 

100-80%

79-70%

69-60%

59-50%

49-40%

39-20%

19-0%

KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDI NG

 

Has a comprehensive/ detailed knowledge of economic

theories and concepts. 30%

Extensive range, depth and complexity of economic theories, concepts and materials.

Excellent defined range and depth of economic theories, concepts and materials.

Clearly defined range and depth of economic theories, concepts and materials.

Compreh ensive and relevant detail but lacking depth in some areas

Has a working knowled ge and relevant detail but lacking depth in most areas.

Moderat e range with some relevant material

, little depth.

Poor understand ing of topic, significant irrelevant material included, did not answer the question.

APPLICATION OF KNOWLEDGE

 

Demonstration of knowledge using examples. 40%

Shows exceptiona l application of relevant economics concepts and theories to issues of study.

All relevant economic s concepts and theories are covered and applied and are relevant to the

area of study.

Most relevant economic s concepts and theories are covered and applied and are relevant to the

area of study.

Understa nds most concepts which are related to study.

Underst ands some concept s which are related to study.

Underst ands concept s but applicati on is incompl ete or inappro priate.

Very limited use of concepts and theories.

Application is not given or considered

.

 

ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION

 

Can analyse data and situations using a wide range of techniques appropriate to the subject. Use of appropriate references to

support the arguments. 20%

Well- integrated study with depth of original and critical analysis.

Well- integrate d study with original and critical analysis.

Largely integrate d study with a good level of original and critical analysis.

Mostly integrate d study with some original and critical analysis.

Shows an accepta ble level of original and critical analysis

.

Predomi nately descripti ve, without originalit y or critical analysis

.

Wholly descriptive

.

COMMUNICATI ON AND PRESENTATION

 

Can engage effectively in debate in a professional manner and produce detailed and coherent project reports.

 

REFERENCING STYLE

Referencing according to Harvard style, in- text referencing and full list of references 10%

Always communic ates effectively and excellently in an appropriat e language.

 

No spelling, grammatic al or referencing errors.

Always communi cates effectivel y in an appropria te manner.

 

Few spelling, grammati cal or referenci ng errors.

Mostly Communi cates effectivel y in an appropria te language.

 

 

 

Some spelling, grammati cal or referenci ng errors.

Sometim es communi cates in an appropria te language. Presents informatio n in a clear and mostly concise manner, sometime s meaning is not clear.

 

Some spelling, grammati cal or referenci

ng errors

Meanin g is clear and format conform s to basic require ments. Limited use of languag e.

 

Major spelling, gramma tical and referenc ing errors.

Meanin g is hazy but use of languag e and format is inappro priate.

 

 

 

Significa nt spelling, gramma tical and referenc ing errors.

Does not communic ate effectively and meaning is unclear.

Does not use appropriat e format/ language.

 

Significant spelling, grammatic al and referencing errors.

 Employability Skills 

This assessment covers the following employability skills, which you could demonstrate on your CV and at job interviews if you successfully pass the assessment

  • Communication
  • Writing
  • Speaking
  • Presenting
  • Non-Verbal
  • Problem-solving
  • Take initiative and self-motivation.
  • Critical thinking
  • Can work under pressure and to deadlines.
  • Planning and organisation skills
  • Team working
  • Digitally literate
  • Creativity/lateral thinking
  • Time management
  • Project management
  • Intellectual curiosity
  • Flexibility
  • Interpersonal
  • Leadership
  • Perseverance
  • Confidence
  • Decision making

Summative Assessment 2

Assessment title

Poster ‘Tax Policy’ and Reflective Summary

Submission date and time

Week 13

Word Count (or equivalent)

10 min Poster + 800 words refection (an allowance of + or – 10% may be made)

Where to submit

Turnitin

Feedback date

Written feedback in 15 working days

Assessment Weighting

50%

Submitting, feedback & grades online using Blackboard

We already have taxes on alcohol, cigarettes, fuel, and sugar. Why not consider taxing other products?

Instructions: Create a poster that explores the idea of imposing an excise tax on a specific product (excluding sugar). This could include products like caffeinated beverages, fatty foods, junk food, or others. Your poster should analyse the economic implications of this potentially controversial policy.

You will need to submit your poster and reflective summary through Turnitin. Additionally, be prepared to give a 10-minute presentation about your work. Practice your presentation ahead of time to ensure you can effectively cover your content within the allotted time.

There is no strict guideline for how your poster should be designed or structured. Feel free to use your creativity and originality in your approach.

Submission Criteria:

Your submission must meet all the following criteria. 

  1. A 10 min presentation + 800 words refection with all the requirements listed above  
  2. Submit the presentation slides and reflection electronically on time via Turnitin by due date and time, present in the class.  
  3. Submission type: Check and comply with the assessments schedule in your Module Study Guide (MSG). 
  4. Be adequately proofread prior to submission, and therefore the work does not contain significant errors of spelling and grammar. 
  5. Please maintain the similarity to below 30%. 
  6. For the reflective summary ensure that font style to be consistent (e.g., Arial or Times New Roman) and font size should be 12 for body text. Line spacing should be 1.5 and alignment should be justified.  Use your creativity for the presentation slides.
  7. Heading and subheadings should be numbered appropriately. 
  8. Reference of all research material and sources (excluded from the word count)  

Main objectives of the Assessment 

No.

Learning Outcome

 

2,4

Learning Outcomes Assessed

 

LO2 Examine how government spending and taxation affect aggregate demand and supply

 

LO4 Apply knowledge of the seminal literature in the areas of public goods, externalities, public choice, and taxation

  

Marking scheme:

Assessment criteria

Maximum Marks

Introduction

10%

Use of PowerPoint

10%

Use of Data to support your argument

30%

Knowledge and understanding

20%

Presentation skills - ability to explain/communicate the

analysis clearly and effectively, professionalism (tone, attire, delivery etc.)

10%

Reflective Summary

20%

Total

100%

Assessment criteria: Poster presentation

100-80%

79-70%

69-60%

59-50%

49-40%

39-30%

29-0%

The work produced is exceptional in most/all aspects, substantially exceeding expectations for this level.

The work produced is of excellent quality, exceeding expectations for this level in many aspects.

The work produced meets all of the intended learning outcomes and exceeds the threshold expectations for

this level in several of them

The work produced meets all of the intended learning outcomes and exceeds the threshold expectations for

this level in some of them.

The work produced meets all of the intended learning outcomes at, but rarely exceeding the threshold expectations for this level.

The work produced fails to meet all of the intended learning outcomes and is marginally inadequate for this level

The work produced fails to meet all of the intended learning outcomes and is inadequate for this level. 

Reflective Summary

 

Skills

Excellent - 70+

Very good - 60 - 69

Good – 50 - 59

Satisfactory - 40 - 49

Poor - 39 and below

Reflection on you as a learner

*Clear articulation of how development and learning is taking place or will take place in the future

 

*Explicit identification of hurdles, personal aims and objectives in the context of your journey as a learner

 

* Clear demonstration of how the personal aims and objectives identified will be met in future actions

 

*Clearly articulated awareness of your own learning process

*  Showing a good ability to articulate how development and learning is taking place or may take place in the future

 

*Good identification of hurdles, personal aims and objectives in the context of your journey as a learner

 

* Good demonstration of how the personal aims and objectives identified will be met in future actions

 

*Demonstrate an awareness of your own learning process, but may not articulate it with clarity

*Some articulation of how development and learning is taking place or may take place in the future

 

*Some identification of major hurdles, personal aims and objectives in the context of your journey as a learner

 

*Some demonstration of how the personal aims and objectives identified may be met in future actions

 

*Demonstrate some awareness of how you learn, with limited articulation of the learning process

*  Limited articulation of how development and learning is taking or may take place

 

*Some limited references to hurdles, personal aims and objectives in the context of your journey as a learner

 

* Limited engagement of how the personal aims and objectives identified will be met in future actions

 

*Limited awareness of how you learn

*No articulation of how development and learning is taking place

 

*No references to hurdles, personal aims and objectives in the context of your journey as a learner, or haphazard unlinked statements

 

*No engagement of how the personal aims and objectives identified will be met in future actions

 

*No demonstration of awareness of how you learn

Structure

*Strong introductory sentence(s), introducing the topic with clarity

 

*Well paragraphed with each new idea or concept paragraphed separately *Clear and accurate sentence structure

 

*Strong conclusion drawing together ideas and leaving a lasting final impression

*Defined introductory sentence(s)

 

*Well paragraphed with most new ideas or concepts paragraphed separately *Clear and accurate sentence structure

 

*A conclusion drawing together ideas and leaving an impression of sorts on the reader

*An introductory sentence(s)

 

*Demonstration of some paragraphing, with some new ideas or concepts paragraphed separately

 

*Acceptable sentence structure *A conclusion drawing together some ideas

*A vague introduction to the topic, but may not be a defined sentence

 

*Limited or no paragraphing

 

*Imprecise sentence structure; may misuse punctuation and, or, run several ideas into one sentence

 

*A limited conclusion

*No introduction to the topic

 

*No paragraphing, or arbitrarily placed paragraphs with no reference to the context of the text

 

*Poor sentence structure and little or no punctuation

 

*No conclusion, post may end abruptly

 

Use of

 

English,

 

accuracy and

 

IT

*All posts written in a suitable academic register

 

*Demonstrates a strong command of appropriate and varied vocabulary

 

*Accurate spelling, grammar and punctuation

 

*Appropriate use of fonts and IT conventions

*At least 80 per cent of posts largely written in a suitable academic register

 

*Demonstrates a good command of appropriate and varied vocabulary

 

*Accurate spelling, grammar and punctuation

 

*Appropriate use of fonts and IT conventions

*At least 60 per cent of posts written with some thought given to a suitable academic register

 

*Demonstrates a reasonable command of appropriate and varied vocabulary

 

*Reasonable accuracy of spelling, grammar and punctuation, with some inaccuracy permitted

 

*Appropriate use of fonts and IT conventions

*Not a great deal of thought given to academic register, but slang and informal language have been largely avoided

 

*Some level of spelling, grammar and punctuation

 

*Appropriate use of fonts

*No attempt made to avoid slang and informal language

 

*Poor spelling, grammar and punctuation

 

*Haphazard use of fonts

 

 

 

Employability Skills

 

This assessment covers the following employability skills, which you could demonstrate on your CV and at job interviews if you successfully pass the assessment:

 

  • Communication
  • Writing
  • Speaking
  • Presenting
  • Non-Verbal
  • Problem-solving
  • Take initiative and self-motivation.
  • Critical thinking
  • Can work under pressure and to deadlines.
  • Planning and organisation skills
  • Team working
  • Digitally literate
  • Creativity/lateral thinking
  • Time management
  • Project management
  • Intellectual curiosity
  • Flexibility
  • Interpersonal
  • Leadership
  • Perseverance
  • Confidence
  • Decision making

 

5             
Learning materials

 

The reading list for this module is available on Blackboard in the module area and online by searching readinglists. This shows real-time availability of books in the library and provides direct links to digital items, recommended by your lecturer.

 

Remember to log into Blackboard daily to receive all the latest news and support available at your module information sites!

 

Subject guides are also available to help you find relevant information for assignments, with contact details of the Subject Librarian for your School.

 

Essential reading

Krugman, P.R., Obstfeld, M. and Melitz, M.J., 2021. International economics: theory and policy. 12th ed. Harlow: Pearson.

Further reading

Barr, N., 2020. Economics of the welfare state. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chang, H-J., 2014. Economics: the user`s guide. London: Pelican.

Frank, R.H. and ProQuest (Firm), 2013. Falling behind: how rising inequality harms the middle class. [eBook] Available through: ProQuest.

 

Piketty, T. and Goldhammer, A., 2013. Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

 

Rawls, J., 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

 

Stiglitz, J.E. and Rosengard, J.K., 2015. Economics of the public sector. 4th ed. New York:

W.W. Norton & Company.

6.Maintaining Academic Honesty and Integrity

Academic Integrity means avoiding plagiarism and cheating and owning your own work, the use of essay mills and AI content is also considered academic misconduct. This is when you submit a piece of work which is not completely your own, but which you are presenting as your own without acknowledging the author or properly referencing the original source. All your work must demonstrate Academic Integrity; it must be an honest and fair submission, complying with all the requirements of the assessment. Failure to meet these standards of behaviour and practice is academic misconduct, which can result in penalties being applied under the Academic Offences Regulations. You can get support with your academic writing by speaking to our Study support team.

7.Meeting Deadlines

You should always try your best to submit your work on time. If your circumstances mean that you are not able to submit on time or are unable to attend an in-person assessment like an exam or in- class test, then you can request Exceptional circumstances for the assessment. An extension allows you to submit coursework up to 10 calendar days late without penalty, (calendar days include all weekends and bank holidays where the University is open). Without an extension, the maximum mark you will be able to get for that work will be the pass mark. Mitigation allows you a further attempt without penalty if you fail an assessment or do not submit.

You can apply for an extension or mitigation by self-certifying that you have exceptional circumstances which affected your ability to undertake the assessment. Self-certifying means

that evidence does not have to be provided, although the University reserves the right to request evidence. All self-certified requests must be made before the deadline and detail the exceptional circumstances that have prevented you from submitting by the original submission deadline. You can only self-certify three assessments per academic year. If you have used all your self- certification opportunities, or requested mitigation after the deadline, you will need to provide evidence of your exceptional circumstances for your request to be granted.

8.Getting Support

There may be times when you experience circumstances outside of your control and talking to your Module Leader/Tutor and seeking help from other support services in the university will keep you on track with your studies. You can access support and guidance and confidential help at our Support for current students page and by vising the Student Hub. It is equally important to consider your safety and the safety of others around you, especially how to stay safe online and ensure your communications are secure and appropriate. You should also familiarise yourself with the University Safeguarding Policy, process, and procedure 

Your Students’ Union Advice Team can help you to obtain the right support.

9.Glossary and Acronyms

Terms and definitions

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions