Describe Christina`s symptoms and experiences as explained by Oliver Sacks.

Neuropsychology AssignmentBrief(1)

Marks: 25 Submission Deadline:

"The Disembodied Lady" is a compelling case discussed by Oliver Sacks in his book "The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat." This chapter focuses on a patient named Christina who experiences a rare neurological condition known as proprioceptive loss. The assignment brief can be structured in the following manner:

●  Summary of the Case: (2)

Describe Christina`s symptoms and experiences as explained by Oliver Sacks.

● Understanding the Case: (5)

Highlight the impact of proprioceptive loss on Christina`s life and how it affects her ability to perceive her own body.

Analyze the implications of proprioceptive loss on an individual`s perception of self and body awareness

Discuss the challenges Christina faces in daily life due to her condition.

Explore the psychological and emotional effects of such a rare neurological disorder on an individual`s mental well-being.

●  Questions for Discussion: (10)

1.  How does proprioceptive loss affect an individual`s sense of body image and self-awareness?

2.  How does Christina`s case contribute to our understanding of the brain`s role in processing bodily sensations and awareness?

 3.  What insights can be gained from this case regarding the relationship between the mind and the body?

 4.  In what ways can neuroscience and psychology offer support or treatment for individuals with proprioceptive loss or similar conditions?

●  Further Research and Developments: (5)

Investigate any advancements or further research that has occurred since the publication of the book regarding proprioceptive loss or related neurological conditions.

Briefly discuss any new treatments, therapies, or discoveries in understanding such disorders that have emerged in the field of neuropsychology.

●Personal Reflection: (3)

Encourage students to reflect on their thoughts, opinions, and emotional responses to the case of Christina. How did it impact their understanding of neurology and human experience?

●References:

Include a list of references used for research and citations.

Important: There is a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism. The assignment will be graded on the basis of the rubric attached below.

● Rubric:

Criteria: Excellent (5) | Good (4) | Satisfactory (3) | Needs Improvement (2) | Poor (1) Content Understanding:

(5) Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the case, effectively analyzing the implications of proprioceptive loss, and discussing its impact on Christina`s life with critical depth.

(4) Shows a good understanding of the case, discussing most of the implications of proprioceptive loss, but lacks depth in analysis or insights.

(3) Adequately covers the case details but lacks in-depth analysis or fails to address some essential aspects of the condition`s impact.

(2) Demonstrates minimal understanding of the case, missing key elements, and lacks analysis or critical thinking.

(1) Fails to demonstrate an understanding of the case, lacks crucial details, analysis, and insights.

Questions for Discussion:

(1) Answers all discussion questions with in-depth analysis, providing critical insights and demonstrating a strong connection to neuropsychological concepts.

(2) Addresses most discussion questions adequately with relevant points but may lack depth in analysis or connection to neuropsychology.

(3)Addresses discussion questions but lacks depth or fails to cover some aspects adequately.

(4) Attempts to address discussion questions but lacks critical analysis or coherence in responses.

(5) Does not effectively address the discussion questions or offers irrelevant information.

Further Research & Developments:

(1) Offers an extensive analysis of recent research advancements and developments related to proprioceptive loss or similar neurological conditions, showcasing an understanding of current trends and findings.

(2) Provides a good overview of recent research and developments but may lack depth or breadth in discussing implications or relevance to the case.

(3) Mentions some recent research and developments, but the discussion lacks depth or relevance to the case.

(4) Makes minimal reference to recent research or developments related to the case, lacking depth or relevant insights.

(5) Fails to include or discuss recent research or developments related to the case