MARKING SCHEME Undergraduate Level 4 – OIM4013-B
|
|
Mark (%)
Class [Descriptor]
|
Information and knowledge (20%)
|
Application (20%)
|
Analysis (20%)
|
Synthesis and context (20%)
|
Presentation (20%)
|
|
70-100
First
[Excellent]
|
Contains all information required, with no major errors and no or very few minor errors.
|
Answers question fully and completely. Excellent adaptation and application of concepts. No irrelevant material.
|
Ideas always expressed logically and coherently. Excellent use of appropriate mathematical / diagrammatic exposition.
|
Excellent integration of ideas and information. Demonstrates substantial understanding of topic within a wider context.
|
Excellent presentation and coherent structure, no grammatical errors, kept to time limit, and no errors in referencing. Excellent clarity in delivery. The digital poster contains succinct content and looks professional.
|
|
60-69
Upper second
[Very good]
|
Contains all or almost all information required, with no major errors and only a few minor errors.
|
Answers question fully. Very good adaptation and application of concepts. Little irrelevant material.
|
Ideas generally expressed logically and coherently. Very good use of appropriate mathematical / diagrammatic exposition.
|
Good integration of ideas and information. Demonstrates understanding of topic within a wider context.
|
Good presentation and coherent structure, little to no errors in grammar and referencing, kept to time limit. Good clarity in delivery. The digital poster is well thought out in terms of content but could look more professional.
|
|
50-59
Lower second
[Good]
|
Contains most information required, with no or very few major errors and some minor errors.
|
Mainly answers question. Good adaptation and application of concepts. Some irrelevant material.
|
Ideas generally expressed logically. Some linking of ideas within the text . Good use of appropriate mathematical / diagrammatic exposition.
|
Competent integration of ideas and information. Demonstrates understanding of the topic and its context but with some minor errors.
|
The presentation and structure is fair. There are some errors in grammar and referencing, some issues with keeping to time limit. Clarity in delivery could be improved. The digital poster is reasonably presented but could contain more detailed content and look more professional.
|
|
40-49
Third
[Satisfactory]
|
Contains basic (core) information required, with some major and minor errors.
|
Only answers some aspects of question. Satisfactory adaptation or application of concepts. Some irrelevant material.
|
Ideas sometimes expressed logically. Limited linking of ideas within the text. Satisfactory use of appropriate mathematical / diagrammatic exposition.
|
Satisfactory integration of ideas and information. Demonstrates limited understanding of topic and its context.
|
The presentation and structure is reasonable. There are multiple errors in grammar and referencing and the presentation was not adequately completed in the time limit. Lacks clarity in delivery. The digital poster lacks detail and is poorly presented.
|
|
30-39
Fail (Tolerable if not core module)
[Limited]
|
Contains a limited amount of the information required, with numerous major and minor errors.
|
Only answers some aspects of question. Limited adaptation or application of concepts. Much irrelevant material.
|
Ideas rarely expressed logically. Little or no linking of ideas within the text. Limited use of appropriate mathematical / diagrammatic exposition.
|
Minimal integration of ideas and information. Demonstrates little understanding of topic and its context.
|
The presentation and structure is below satisfactory. There are multiple errors in grammar and the reference list is brief. The task was not completed in the time limit and there was very limited clarity in delivery. There is very little detail and effort made in the presentation of the digital poster.
|
|
0-29
Fail (Not tolerable)
[Poor]
|
Contains none or almost none of information required and with many major and minor errors.
|
Wholly fails to answer question. No adaptation or application of concepts. Largely irrelevant material.
|
Ideas expressed incoherently. No linking of ideas within text. Little or no use of appropriate mathematical / diagrammatic exposition.
|
No integration of ideas and information. Demonstrates no understanding of topic and its context.
|
The presentation and structure is very poor. There are multiple grammatical errors and there is no reference list. Little consideration given to the time limit and little to no clarity in delivery. The digital poster is very poor with little to no detail.
|
|
Your Grade
|
|
|
|
|
|
