What did I learn? What there anything new to me? Was there something that changed my views and why? What themes could I analyse, and do I view as important?
2024-11-14 13:50:36
Individual Self Assessment Exercise
This part of the course is assessed through the writing of a reflection individually. The purpose of this reflection is for you to show your progress as a student about your understanding, knowledge and skills. It can also promote critical thinking about the various topics (Wallin & Adawi, 2018).
The purpose of this is not to report what was said in the class (or reading or lecture), but it is your view of what you have learnt and your insights on any of the aspects presented. While you may want to allude to the key ideas presented in the lecture, you need to reflect on how this has stimulated some other thoughts for you. It is suggested that after each class, you write a summary of the session as this will help you when thinking about the influence of the topic on your understanding and other ideas.
The following questions may help you write your reflective journal entries:
1) What did I learn? What there anything new to me? Was there something that changed my views and why? What themes could I analyse, and do I view as important? How did the various topics link to previous learning and other (work) experiences that I have had?
2) Was there anything that I did not understand? What went against my own (pre-existing) ideas? Why? What was less comprehensible? Why? Were there any questions that left me puzzled?
3) What difficulties, if any, have I experienced as part of the learning process?
4) What specific contribution has the course made to your thinking? What has each section taught you? How relevant will it be for you in other studies (e.g., other courses)?
5) How does this support your development as a student and in your future employment? Make a note of and reflect on the changes in your thinking that have come about.
The reflection is to be submitted as one submission with a minimum of 6 entries included in this submission. Total word count is 1000 words for each team member. All team members must include their individual work in the team report as one submission. Failure to do so will result in zero marks for this part of the assessment.
|
Team Project Plan Activities
|
85-100 Outstanding
|
70-84 Excellent
|
60-69 Very Good
|
55-59 Good
|
50-54 Acceptable
|
0-49 Fail
|
|
Analysis and critical discussion of a key project management concept
Mark: /20
|
Exceptional level of competence in presenting the concept. Exceptional knowledge and insightful synthesis of the concept in relation to PM. Robust critical analysis in an outstanding way.
|
Excellent level of competence in presenting the concept. Excellent knowledge and insightful synthesis of the concept in relation to PM. Excellent critical analysis
|
Very good level of competence in presenting the concept. Very good knowledge and insightful synthesis of the concept in relation to PM. Very good critical analysis
|
Good level of competence in presenting the concept. Good knowledge and synthesis of the concept in relation to PM. Good critical analysis
|
Acceptable level of competence in presenting the concept. Acceptable knowledge and synthesis of the concept in relation to PM. Acceptable critical analysis
|
Insufficient level of competence in presenting the concept. Insufficient knowledge and lack of synthesis of the concept in relation to PM. Insufficient critical analysis
|
|
Provide a solution for a project scenario by using a PM tool to visualise and then critically discuss this scenario highlighting what is working and what is notMark: /30
|
Exceptional skills in the development of a realistic solutions. Outstanding project management skills in solving the problem and is presented in an exceptionally professional manner. Exceptional critical analysis skills.
|
Excellent skills in the development of a realistic solutions. Excellent project management skills in solving the problem and is presented in an excellent professional manner. Excellent critical analysis skills
|
Very good skills in the development of a realistic solutions. Very good project management skills in solving the problem and is presented in a very good professional manner. Very good critical analysis skills
|
Good skills in the development of a realistic solutions. Good project management skills in solving the problem and is presented in a good professional manner. Good critical analysis skills
|
Acceptable skills in the development of a realistic solutions. Acceptable project management skills in solving the problem and is presented in an acceptable manner. Acceptable critical analysis skills
|
Insufficient skills in the development of a realistic solutions. Insufficient project management skills in solving the problem and is presented in an insufficient manner. Insufficient critical analysis skills
|
|
Use the above analysis to solve the problem using a specified tool
Mark: __/20
|
Exceptional level of competence in presenting the phase of the project. Exceptional knowledge and skills in applying the correct tool to the scenario with a full explanation to support
|
Excellent level of competence in presenting the phase of the project. Excellent knowledge and skills in applying the correct tool to the scenario with a full explanation to support
|
Very good level of competence in presenting the phase of the project. Very good knowledge and skills in applying the correct tool to the scenario with a very good explanation to support
|
Good level of competence in presenting the phase of the project. Good knowledge and skills in applying the correct tool to the scenario with a good explanation to support
|
Acceptable level of competence in presenting the phase of the project. Acceptable knowledge and skills in applying the correct tool to the scenario with an explanation to support
|
Poor level of competence in presenting the phase of the project. Poor knowledge and skills in applying the correct tool to the scenario with no/little explanation to support
|
|
Individual Assessment exercise
Mark: __/25 (individual mark)
|
Exceptional skill in honestly assessing your performance in this module addressing all questions asked
|
Excellent skill in honestly assessing your performance in this module addressing all questions asked
|
Very good skill in honestly assessing your performance in this module addressing all questions asked
|
Good skill in honestly assessing your performance in this module addressing the questions asked
|
Acceptable skill in honestly assessing your performance in this module addressing the questions asked basically
|
Poor skill in honestly assessing your performance in this module not addressing all questions asked
|
|
Writing, grammar and referencing
Mark: /5
|
Outstanding presentation, structure, grammar, spelling and Harvard referencing
|
Excellent presentation, structure, grammar, spelling and Harvard referencing
|
Very good presentation, structure, grammar, spelling and Harvard referencing
|
Good presentation, structure, grammar, spelling and Harvard referencing
|
Adequate presentation, structure, grammar, spelling and Harvard referencing
|
Poor and inadequate presentation, structure, grammar, spelling and lacks Harvard referencing
|
|
Total Mark: /100
|
Overall Comment:
|
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions
