LO1 Search for and analyse information on a specific topic independently.

Module overview

This is a 40 credits module delivered across two semesters. It is delivered face to face and weekly attendance to classes is expected from all students.

Firstly, you will be invited to choose a project topic of interest along with a supervisor, who you will work with for the duration of the module. You will start off by preparing a project proposal that will need to be discussed and approved by your project supervisor. After approval, you will begin a detailed literature review of your chosen field and topic. You will then select and follow a suitable development methodology leading to an implementation which you will evaluate before finally presenting the artefact to the school.

The module provides an opportunity for you to develop the skills necessary to carry out an individual project, write a report about it, and discuss your work in a form of oral discussion to the school. It will enable you to identify appropriate research and/or development exercise that addresses an academic issue. It will allow you to identify an in-depth investigation of a topic of particular interest to you in the field of computing and information systems. The investigation includes a literature survey of the topic, selection of appropriate software and/or systems and the identification of the methodology that would be used in the project itself.

Project Topic

A list of project topics is shared with all students. The list provides a wide range of topics offered by academic staff from various disciplines such as Computer Science, AI, Cyber Security and Information Systems. The list is to help you to choose the right topic and preferred supervisor.

Alternatively, you can choose any topic from the field of Computing, subject to the supervisor’s agreement.

Project Supervisor

All assessment work will be marked and assessed by your Project Supervisor together with a panel of academics from the Computing subject area. You will have weekly group meetings with your supervisor and keep on track with your progress. You will be required to keep a logbook to record your weekly progress; the logbook will be allocated marks which will contribute to the overall mark for the module.

However, please note that, apart from assessing your work, the role of a project supervisor is to give guidance and monitor your progress to ensure that you are following the right procedures. It is your responsibility to manage the project and set up a feasible project plan from the beginning.

Project Supervisor Form

To confirm your Project topic, you will be submitting the Project Supervisor Form on-line on blackboard by 14th October 2024 (week 2, semester 1).

Project Lectures

Project lectures will be delivered to give you general guidelines. These will be delivered by various academics every week.

Preparing for your Assessment

A key part of your learning will be preparation for your summative assessment, i.e. project proposal at the end of semester 1 and project report and poster presentation/oral discussion at the end of semester 2.

You will be provided formative feedback on a weekly basis during your group tutorials with your supervisor, and this will help you, to better understand what is required of you when you submit your summative assessment. Weekly progress for semester 1 and 2 will be recorded in logbooks for semester 1 and 2 and this will contribute to the overall marks for the module.

Summative Assessments

Summative Assessment 1

Assessment title

Written Assessment (Project Proposal)

Submission date and time

Submission of project proposal, Progress Report Form (S1), and Ethics form.Online by 5pm on 16/12/2024 (Week 12).

Word Count (or equivalent)

2000 words for the project proposal

Where to submit

Online Blackboard

Feedback date

Online feedback within 10 working days

Assessment Weighting

20%

PSRB requirements (if applicable)

30% threshold will be applied to students on the Computer Sc course. IET requirement.

Submitting, feedback & grades online using Blackboard

Main objectives of the Assessment

You need to write a project proposal to demonstrate your understanding of your chosen project topic:

  • Provide researched literature review around your project topic
  • Identify gaps in the current of state of art
  • Formulate research question(s)
  • Develop project aims and objectives
  • Illustrate your project journey with a project plan

Progress Report form 1 - Weekly progress of your project journey recorded in a form (S1)

Ethics Form – Once you agree the proposal with your supervisor, you will complete this form, have it signed by your supervisor and submit it on-line on blackboard by 16th December 2024 (week 12, semester 1).

Marking criteria for Assessment 1

Criteria

Allocated Mark

Marking breakdown

Scholarship

10

Aim and objectives are clear and realistically formulated.

(Note. Objectives must refer to the entire research project and not only the artefact)

Do you explore the issues involved in the selected topic with respect to the relevant literature?

5

Definition of terms used

10

The background explored

10

Outline of the relevant literature and any gap(s) identified

(45 marks)

10

Appropriate references to the literature with correct in-text citation

Research Question and Rationale

(15 marks)

 

15

The rationale for the research question(s) justified

i.e. what is research question and why it is important to find the answer to this question?

Research Method and Plan

10

An appropriate research method(s) chosen i.e. The justification of how the research will be undertaken has been explained

Do you demonstrate your understanding of research methodologies?

(20 marks)

 

10

 Project Plan – all tasks listed, and a Gantt chart is produced for the entire project

 

 

 

Presentation

(10 marks)

 

4

The project proposal is well-structured with an appropriate academic writing style. Planned sequence of sections and each section is appropriate as per template.

3

Clear headings, introductory statements, and summaries; Diagrams clearly labelled and explained in text.

3

Very good grammar and syntax with correct spelling. Language free

from jargon. Document is proofread and use of consistent formatting throughout the report.

Progress Report for Semester 1

(10 marks)

 

10

Evidence of engagement with the supervisor. Log of weekly progress using the given Progress Report form. Progress Report to be signed by the supervisor.

Summative Assessment 2

Assessment title

Written Assessment (Project Report)

Submission date and time

Submission of project report and Progress Report form (S2):

Online by 5pm on 08/05/2024 (Week 12)

Word Count (or equivalent)

10,000 words for the project

Where to submit

Online

Feedback date

Online feedback within 10 working days

Assessment Weighting

60%

PSRB requirements (if applicable)

30% threshold will be applied to students on the Computer Sc course. IET requirement.

Submitting, feedback & grades online using Blackboard

Main objectives of the Assessment

You will produce a project report in the format described in the Project Report Template which will be available as a separate document on Blackboard for your perusal.

Project Report

The report will need to be well-structured with an appropriate academic writing style and include planned sequence of sections:

  • Contents list
  • Abstract
  • Introduction to the project
  • In-depth evidence of literature review
  • Research methodology
  • Discussions and analysis of results
  • Conclusions drawn up

Progress Report Form 2: Weekly progress of your project journey recorded in a form (S2)

Marking criteria for Assessment 2

Criteria

Allocated Mark

Issues

 

 

Research Method

5

Demonstrated good understanding of research methodologies

 

5

Applied the method appropriately and correctly and is clearly evidenced in the report.

5

Demonstrated the ability to evaluate their own use of the method

 

 

 

Literature Review

5

A complete report of the background study which shows very good understanding of the topic

 

5

The report has clearly distinguished between facts, speculations, and opinions

5

Quality and quantity of selected references to support argument

5

There is evidence that the researcher has read, analysed, and reflected on the knowledge relevant to the topic

 

 

Use of evidence

5

Design models demonstrated in the report

 

 

5

Clarity of evidence of progress towards project aims and objectives e.g. prototype, demonstration, evaluation instrument, software coding, UML models

10

EITHER distinguishes between different types of evidence collected OR provides appropriate evidence of software analysis / design / development /

quality / testing

 

 

 

Presentation

4

The project report is well-structured with an appropriate academic writing style. Planned sequence of sections and each section is appropriate as per template.

 

3

Clear headings, introductory statements and summaries; Diagrams clearly labelled and explained in text.

3

Very good grammar and syntax with correct spelling. Language free from jargon. Document is proof-read and use of formatting is consistent throughout the report.

 

 

Analysis of results

4

Conceptual grasp of topic, clear arguments

 

2

Indicates limits of method chosen for investigation or software development

4

Review critically the outcome and progress of your own work, suggests further work

Conclusions drawn

10

Quality of conclusions based on the evidence collected

 

References

5

Appropriate references listed with correct in-text citation

 

Progress Report

10

Evidence of engagement with the supervisor to be signed by the supervisor.

 

Summative Assessment 3

Assessment title

Oral Examination (Project Poster and Oral Discussion)

Submission date and time

Submission of project poster: Online by 5pm on 12/05/2025.

5 mins of oral discussion of project work and demonstration of artefact produced. This could be pre-recorded as a video clip and played back for the marking team during the poster presentation on 12th May 2025.

Word Count (or equivalent)

One page (A3 paper size) using given template

5 mins video clip/oral discussion of project artefact.

Where to submit

Poster submission: Online

Oral presentation/discussion in person on 12th May 2025

Feedback date

Online feedback within 10 working days

Assessment Weighting

20%

PSRB

requirements (if applicable)

30% threshold will be applied to students on the Computer Sc course. IET requirement.

Submitting, feedback & grades online using Blackboard

Main objectives of the Assessment

You will produce a project poster using the given Project Poster Template which will be available as a separate document on Blackboard for your perusal. The poster will need to be well- structured to illustrate clarity of information and effective use of design (text and graphics).

For the oral discussion, you will be given 5 mins to run your software as well as show and discuss relevant sections of your code. You may choose to prepare a short video clip beforehand and use it to discuss your artefact.

This will take place in the presence of your supervisor as well as other members of staff. They will ask you about your project and assess your work. You must ensure your attendance is logged as otherwise you may be recorded as absent and receive no marks.

Marking criteria for Assessment 3

Criteria

Allocated Mark

Marking Breakdown

 

 

 

 

Oral Discussion (60 marks)

20

Ability to demonstrate the proposed artefact/solution either verbally or using a

pre-recorded video clip

5

Oral discussion is concise and limited to the set 5 mins time frame

5

Effectiveness of the solution discussed

5

Clear justification for the proposed solution

5

Ability to communicate concepts and information

 

 

10

Ability to critically evaluate the achieved work and answer all questions

10

Ability to articulate future work possible

 

 

 

Poster (40 marks)

5

The poster is well-structured with an appropriate use of template.

10

Clear headings and clarity of information provided.

10

Poster is free from spelling errors, proof-read and the use of formatting is consistent throughout.

10

Effective use of design (text and graphics)

5

Appropriate references listed

List of Learning Outcomes that are to be assessed

No.

Learning Outcome

Marking Criteria given separately for each Assessments below

1

Search for and analyse information on a specific topic independently.

Assessment 1 and 2: Written Assignment

2

Analyse and critically evaluate research literature.

Assessment 1 and 2: Written Assignment

3

Communicate effectively, through a presentation to a range of audience.

Assessment 3: Oral Examination

4

Apply in-depth knowledge of a topic within computing to problem solving.

Assessment 1 and 2: Written Assignment

5

Plan, organise and implement a solution to a problem.

Assessment 2: Written Assignment

6

Analyse and evaluate the results of the final deliverable of the project

Assessment 2: Written Assignment

Assessment 3: Oral Examination

Learning materials

The reading list for this module is available on Blackboard in the module area and online by searching readinglists. This shows real-time availability of books in the library and provides direct links to digital items, recommended by your lecturer.

Remember to log into Blackboard daily to receive all the latest news and support available at your module information sites!

Subject guides are also available to help you find relevant information for assignments, with contact details of the Subject Librarian for your School.

Maintaining Academic Honesty and Integrity

Academic Integrity means avoiding plagiarism and cheating and owning your own work, the use of essay mills and AI content is also considered academic misconduct. This is when you submit a piece of work which is not completely your own, but which you are presenting as your own without acknowledging the author or properly referencing the original source. All your work must demonstrate Academic Integrity; it must be an honest and fair submission, complying with all the requirements of the assessment. Failure to meet these standards of behaviour and practice is academic misconduct, which can result in penalties being applied under the Academic Offences Regulations. You can get support with your academic writing by speaking to our Study support team.

Meeting Deadlines

You should always try your best to submit your work on time. If your circumstances mean that you are not able to submit on time or are unable to attend an in-person assessment like an exam or in- class test, then you can request Exceptional circumstances for the assessment. An extension allows you to submit coursework up to 10 calendar days late without penalty, (calendar days include all weekends and bank holidays where the University is open). Without an extension, the maximum mark you will be able to get for that work will be the pass mark. Mitigation allows you a further attempt without penalty if you fail an assessment or do not submit.

You can apply for an extension or mitigation by self-certifying that you have exceptional circumstances which affected your ability to undertake the assessment. Self-certifying means that evidence does not have to be provided, although the University reserves the right to request evidence. All self-certified requests must be made before the deadline and detail the exceptional circumstances that have prevented you from submitting by the original submission deadline. You can only self-certify three assessments per academic year. If you have used all your self- certification opportunities, or requested mitigation after the deadline, you will need to provide evidence of your exceptional circumstances for your request to be granted.

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions