LO1 Critically evaluate major theories relating to motivation, engagement and commitment at work, their impact upon decision making and how they are put into systemic practice within the organisation.
2025-08-26 14:23:18
Lincoln International Business School (LIBS)
LIBS Vision:
To provide an innovative, scholarly learning environment based on a commitment to responsible management practices and a global community mind-set.
LIBS Mission:
To develop socially responsible leaders ready to meet the challenges of 21st century business.
Contents
Contact Details
Module Synopsis
Module Learning Outcomes
AACSB
Learning and Teaching Approach
Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME)
Module Delivery
Formative Feedback Strategy
Assessment
Professional, Statutory and Regulatory Body Requirements
Learning Resources
Schedule of Activity
Assessment Briefing: Business Report
Assessment Criteria Grid: Business Report
Assurance of Learning Core Competencies
|
Module Title
|
People Management and Development
|
|
Subject Group
|
People, Leadership, Organisations and Management
|
|
Academic Year
|
2024-25
|
|
Module Code
|
HRM9051
|
|
Credit Rating
|
15
|
|
Level
|
Level 7
|
|
External Examiner
|
|
The importance of principles-led, evidence-based and outcomes-driven people profession practice is at the core of this module.
This module aims to provide learners with a rigorous framework of knowledge and understanding concerning people management and development. The module seeks to familiarise learners with major contemporary research evidence on employment and effective approaches to the management of people at work.
Research focusing on the links between people management practices and positive organisational outcomes is covered, as is research that highlights major contemporary changes and developments in practice.
Learners are also introduced to major debates about theory and practice in the specific fields of leadership, flexibility and change management, the aim being to help them become effective managers as well as effective HR specialists.
Module Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of the module, you will be able to:
LO1 Critically evaluate major theories relating to motivation, engagement and commitment at work, their impact upon decision making and how they are put into systemic practice within the organisation.
LO2 Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of organisational culture and the psychology of change and their impact on the development of effective change management methodologies, practices, and processes for sustainable change in organisations.
LO3 Evaluate models and theories on how HR professionals can, through commitment to [and practice of] compassion, humanity and fairness at work, create meaningful voice for others in the organisational decision-making process.
LO4 Analyse the major trends in inclusive HR working practices and processes, considering the role of collaborative relationships and their impact upon organisations and people management practices and cultures.
AACSB
In addition to module learning outcomes, selected modules within Lincoln International Business School are required to deliver and assess core competencies associated with our mission as an AACSB Accrediting Business School; and as such reflect core skills and knowledge sets associated with being a graduate in business management. There are twelve core competencies, and these are distributed across modules associated with each programme. Each core competency is assessed through the assessment(s) for a module and is identified on relevant the Assessment Rubric.
The assessment of these core competencies is not weighted (they don’t contribute to your grade) but is assessed based on proficiency/non-proficiency. If you find yourself not achieving proficiency, then this will not directly affect the outcome for a module but is an opportunity for you to reflect on your own development and how you can work towards proficiency at a later opportunity. We will also reflect on the overall outcomes for modules and programmes and seek to enhance our teaching, learning and assessment as a result.
The Core Competencies assessed in this module are as follows:
CC7 Evaluate teamworking and leadership effectiveness, respecting individual and cultural diversity.
CC12 Appraise trends and their potential impacts on own agency and effectiveness in the context of sustainability.
Learning and Teaching Approach
This module will encourage learners to reflect on and critically evaluate the practice of people management and development. The Module will adopt evidence based, principles led and student-centred approaches to learning and teaching. Discussions, presentations, and case studies will be used throughout. Theory and practice will be critically analysed and evaluated by means of directed reading, class debates and discussion. Skills development will be an objective in attaining the learning outcomes, and case studies, projects, role plays, individual and small group learning will be encouraged to allow for feedback and reflection.
Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME)
Lincoln International Business School is committed to the Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME) to develop future leaders that are socially responsible who will create sustainable environmental and economic value.
As institutions of higher education involved in the development of current and future managers, we declare our willingness to progress in the implementation, within our institution, of the following Principles, starting with those that are more relevant to our capacities and mission. We will report on progress to all our stakeholders and exchange effective practices related to these principles with other academic institutions.
This module contributes to the PRME agenda by enabling students to develop responsible and sustainable leadership skills in the field of human resource management by undertaking activities that align with the i5 characteristics below.
The i5 Characteristics aim to:
- Make learning Meaningful.
- Facilitate Active Engagement
- Design for Iteration
- Develop supportive Social Interaction
Module Delivery
|
Module Delivery
|
Total Hours
|
|
Lectures
|
12
|
|
Seminars
|
12
|
|
Independent Study
|
126
|
|
Nominal Total (15 CATS)
|
150
|
Formative Feedback Strategy
Receiving formative feedback during your learning is essential to ensure you are prepared for your final assessments. To support your learning throughout the module the following formative feedback strategies are used:
- Midterm formative assessment
- Feedback on draft writing
- Peer Feedback
Assessment
Assessment comprises a written assignment of 3,500 words (+/- 10%). The work must demonstrate conversance with academic literature and be applied to practical situations.
Assessment Method: Individual written assignment
Weighting: 100%
Full assessment details are available in the Assessment Briefing(s) at the end of the module handbook. This module uses Assessment Criteria Grids to provide feedback via Turnitin.
|
Assessment Method
|
Weighting
|
LO’s tested
|
Assessment hand in Week
|
|
Assignment
|
100%
|
LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
|
16
|
Professional, Statutory and Regulatory Body Requirements
This module contributes to a programme of study which maps and aligns to the CIPD Profession Map standards at Chartered level for a membership outcome. To qualify for a CIPD accredited overall programme, each module must achieve an overall minimum 50% pass mark.
Learning Resources
The key text(s) for this module are:
Armstrong, M. (2020) Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. London: Kogan Page
Hodges, J. (2016) Managing and Leading People Through Organizational Change: The Theory and Practice of Sustaining Change Through People. London: Kogan Page
Other recommended reading for the module is:
Denning, S. (2018) The emergence of Agile people management, Journal of Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 46 (4) pp. 3-11,
Hannes, L., Segers, J., van Dierendonck, D and den Hartog, D. (2018) Managing people in organizations: Integrating the study of HRM and leadership. Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 28 (3), pp. 249-258.
Hayes, J. (2018) The theory and practice of change management London: Palgrave
Hayward, S (2018) The Agile Leader: how to create an agile business in the digital age. London: Kogan Page
Other more specific references are provided on the module Blackboard site and will be signposted in class. You are also expected to read independently for this module, in particular the CIPD articles that are regularly posted on the Blackboard site for the module. This module requires that you follow the Harvard System of referencing.
Schedule of Activity
|
Week
|
W/C
|
Lecture Topic
|
Supporting Reading (Available via Talis reading list)
|
|
1
|
23-Sep
|
Introductory lecture – the CIPD Profession Map
|
Please read chapter one of Armstrong’s Handbook of HRM. A PDF of the chapter can be found in the lecture resources. Please also read the module handbook.
|
|
2
|
30-Sep
|
HRM in context – the focus of HR
|
Denning, S. (2018) The emergence of Agile people management, Journal of Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 46 (4) pp. 3-11,
|
|
3
|
7-Oct
|
Motivation, engagement, and commitment part one – why do we work?
|
Wickens, Z. (2024) How far can a reward and benefits strategy truly impact recruitment and retention? Employee Benefits Weekly 19th July 2024
|
|
4
|
14-Oct
|
Motivation, engagement, and commitment – part two – what do we get from work?
|
Please read Section V – chapters 24/25/26 of Armstrong’s Handbook of HRM.
|
|
5
|
21-Oct
|
Principles of Leadership and Management
|
Hannes, L., Segers, J., van Dierendonck, D and den Hartog, D. (2018) Managing people in organizations: Integrating the study of HRM and leadership. Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 28 (3), pp. 249-258.
|
|
6
|
28-Oct
|
Drivers for change management
|
CIPD Factsheet – Why Organisations need to change.
A link to the paper can be found on the Blackboard site
|
|
7
|
4-Nov
|
Independent Study Week
|
Please submit a first draft of section one to the Turnitin link on Blackboard to receive formative feedback
|
|
8
|
11-Nov
|
Methodologies and practice for leading change
|
Kayani, M.B., Ali, M. and Javed, H. (2022) What literature has to say about commitment to change: philosophy of commitment to change, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35 (4/5)
|
|
9
|
18-Nov
|
Inclusive change management
|
Fisker, F. (2024) Why we should allow subcultures to thrive, People Management, CIPD July 2024
|
|
10
|
25-Nov
|
Learning and development – the changing organisation
|
Finch, S. (2019) Should your employees be learning as they go? People Management: CIPD – see link to article on Blackboard
|
|
11
|
2-Dec
|
Organisation design and development
|
Reading will be posted on Blackboard site in advance of the seminar
|
|
12
|
9-Dec
|
Making the business case – skills for the HR professional
|
CIPD professional advice guides – see Blackboard for list
|
|
13-15
|
16-Dec
|
Winter Break
|
|
|
16
|
6-Jan
|
Reviewing and reflecting on change management in organisations
|
Please submit your assessment to the Turnitin link on Blackboard by 12 noon on 8th January
|
Assessment Briefing: Business Report
Module Title:People Management and Development
Module Code:HRM9051
Assessment:Business Report
Weighting:100%
Deadline: 8th January 2025 Midday
Description of Assessment Task and Purpose:
You are required to submit a Business Report (see format and additional information below), in no more than 3,500 words, in which you are to imagine that you are the HR Business Partner in an organisation that is preparing for large-scale organisational change. The report should critically discuss the theories associated with the management of change in response to major trends in inclusive HRM, working practices and processes. The purpose of this assessment is to judge your knowledge of the subject area, an ability to find and evaluate accurate and reliable information/evidence and present it in a clear, and concise way using business language.
Learning Outcomes Assessed:
LO1 Critically evaluate major theories relating to motivation, engagement and commitment at work, their impact upon decision making and how they are put into systemic practice within the organisation.
LO2 Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of organisational culture and the psychology of change and their impact on the development of effective change management methodologies, practices & processes for sustainable change in organisations.
LO3 Evaluate models and theories on how HR professionals can, through commitment to [and practice of] compassion, humanity and fairness at work, create meaningful voice for others in the organisational decision-making process.
LO4 Analyse the major trends in inclusive HR working practices and processes, considering the role of collaborative relationships and their impact upon organisations and people management practices & cultures.
Knowledge & Skills Assessed:
Please note that the assessment of this module contributes to the following programme outcomes:
IS7 Enhance professional practice in HRM.
IS8 Employ a wide range of critical problem-solving techniques to HRM issues.
KU1 Identify key concepts and models in the areas of HRM and apply best practice/best fit solutions to a range of organisational issues.
KU2 Demonstrate an intensive and critical appreciation of relevant literature and theory.
KU3 Employ a theoretical framework for the analysis and selection of key business themes which may be applied to work-based learning experiences.
KU4 Identify major problem areas within organisations and develop critical appraisal of solutions within their business arena.
PS11 Make informed judgements on a range of performance issues and organisational challenges and advise appropriately.
PS12 Apply a range of specialist skills to an organisational context.
TS13 Display a comprehensive and integrative appreciation of the theoretical and applied perspectives acquired within their investigation of practice.
The module and assessment also contribute to development of the following:
Subject Specific Knowledge, Skills and Understanding: e.g., Literature searching, Referencing, Numeracy, Health and Safety, Project Planning, Techniques and Skills Subject-specific knowledge.
Professional Graduate Skills: e.g., independence and personal responsibility, adaptability, verbal communication, written communication, creativity, critical thinking, IT skills, self-reflection and life-long learning, problem solving, group or team skills, effective time management, working under pressure to meet deadlines, negotiation skills, leadership.
Emotional Intelligence: e.g., self-awareness, self-management, awareness of others, managing and supporting others, motivation, resilience, self-confidence.
Career-focused Skills: An understanding of the range of graduate careers, skills and attributes required by employers, a range of strategies to present skills and attributes to employers.
Assessment Submission Instructions:
You are required to submit your assessment before 12pm (midday) on Wednesday 8th January 2025 using the online assessment submission facility on the Module Blackboard site. Pay careful attention to instructions provided at the time of submission.
Date for Return of Feedback:
Wednesday 29th January 2025
Format for Assessment:
Please follow the instructions below for the correct format of the business report. No other formats will be accepted.
The REPORT is a maximum of 3500 words, a reference list is required. Appendices are permitted and will not form part of the overall word count. Please follow the formatting guidelines below:
- Format: Microsoft Word (PDF documents will NOT be marked)
- Font/Size: Arial 12
- Lin spacing 1.5 with equal justification at both margins.
- Pagination required: Yes.
- Referencing: Full compliance with Harvard protocols
- Reference list: Required
- Table of Contents: Required
- Abstract/ Executive Summary: NOT required.
The specific format should be as follows:
Each section should begin on a new page and headings should be used to guide the reader, please note the following sections of the business report.
Title page
Table of Contents
Introduction
Findings and Discussion – split into sections according to the requirements of the task and learning outcomes.
Recommendations
Appendices
Please note that this assignment is limited to 3,500 words. The word count includes everything in the main body of the text (including headings, tables, citations, quotes etc). It does NOT include your reference list.
The word count should be clearly stated on the front cover page. Please note that the word limit for this assignment is an absolute maximum. Misrepresentation of word counts to gain an unfair advantage in assessment may be referred as an academic offence.
Students should be aware that the marker will not include any work after the maximum word limit has been reached within the allocation of marks. Students may therefore be penalised for a failure to be concise and for failing to conclude their work within the word limit specified. Likewise, a failure to meet the maximum word limit may result in lower marks based on the quality of the work because they may not have included the necessary information required for the assessment and met the intended learning outcomes.
Marking Criteria for Assessment:
Please see attached marking rubric.
Please note that all work is assessed according to the University of Lincoln Management of Assessment Policy and that marks awarded are provisional on Examination Board decisions (which take place at the end of the Academic Year.
Feedback Format:
Formative feedback and feed forward comments will be provided on part one of the findings and discussion section of the report by submitting a draft copy of the section to the Turnitin link provided in week seven. This process is designed to guide your progress during the rest of the assessment.
Summative feedback will be provided using a marking rubric (see below) and brief comments on the final submission.
Additional Information for Completion of Assessment:
Change Management is a major challenge in terms of leading, managing and developing people. It can be a difficult process to achieve successfully, or even adequately; it is often met with resistance as people face uncertainty.
You are required to imagine that you are a HR Business Partner working for an organisation which is preparing for a large-scale structural change. Your HR Director has asked you to advise the organisational leadership team on how they can prepare for and implement this change
Using the standard business report guidance provided, you must prepare a report to outline the importance of preparation for the change and make THREE recommendations to the senior leadership team. These recommendations must be clearly justified and articulated to create a credible, persuasive, and well-informed plan.
The introduction section of the report should provide a brief analysis of the major trends in HR practices and processes and acknowledge the impact of potential change for organisations
The findings and discussion part of the report should be split into sections according to the requirements of the learning outcomes of the assessment and should critically discuss and evaluate the theories associated with the management of change in response to major trends in inclusive HRM, working practices and processes. The findings and discussion part of the report should also identify and critically analyse the process of change management, using theoretical models and demonstrate knowledge of the psychology of change.
The recommendations part of the report should identify the three recommendations and demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the impact of organisational culture on the change management process. As a HR Business Partner, your role will be to recommend changes to the organisation that demonstrate your ability to practice fairness and compassion during a change management process.
Further information and discussions on this task will take place during seminar sessions during the module.
Important Information on Dishonesty & Plagiarism:
In submitting your work for assessment, in accordance with the University Regulations, you are certifying that this is entirely your own work without input from either commercial or non-commercial writers or editors, or advanced technologies such as Artificial Intelligence services, unless explicitly allowed and referenced, beyond that permitted by the proof-reading policy (web). You also confirm all sources have been correctly attributed or referenced. You may be required to evidence that the work submitted is indeed your own, through making available drafts and data to any integrity investigation. Should such misconduct in assessment be detected prior to or following the final examination board, then the penalties imposed could be severe; including the revoking of any degree awarded. Academic offence proceedings initiated by the University may delay graduation and/or extend beyond the time frame of an academic year. For further information, see plagiarism.org
Assessment Criteria Grid: Business Report
|
Learning Outcome
|
0-29
|
0-39
|
40-49
|
50-59
|
60-69
|
70-79
|
80+
|
|
LO1: Critically evaluate major theories relating to motivation, engagement and commitment at work, their impact upon decision making and how they are put into systemic practice within the organisation.
|
Fails to demonstrate any understanding of the major research and debates around motivation, engagement, and commitment at work. Fails to review and critically evaluate major contemporary HRM/D research.
|
Demonstrates inadequate understanding of the major research and debates around motivation, engagement, and commitment at work. Fails to review and critically evaluate major contemporary HRM/D research
|
There is only a partial understanding of the major research around motivation, engagement and commitment at work evidenced in the student’s work, which is more descriptive than evaluative.
|
There is evidence of understanding of the main research around motivation, engagement, and commitment at work, but this is not developed and only partially evaluated.
|
The major research and debates around motivation, engagement and commitment at work have been analysed to an extent although somewhat descriptive and undeveloped. There is a satisfactory level of understanding evidenced in the work. Work is in an academic style but requires increased depth of research and debate.
|
The major research around motivation, engagement and commitment at work have been evaluated fully and some insightful observations have been made. There is clear understanding of the concept. Some practical solutions are offered. Work is of a high academic standard.
|
A thoughtful critique of the major research and debates around motivation, engagement and commitment at work is achieved, with evidence of thorough understanding and practical, feasible solutions offered. Academic work is of publishable standard.
|
|
LO2: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of organisation culture and the psychology of change and their impact on the development of effective change management methodologies, practices and processes for sustainable change in organisations.
|
Does not demonstrate any knowledge and understanding of organisational culture and psychology of change.
|
Demonstrates inadequate knowledge and understanding of organisational culture and psychology of change.
|
Recognition and some understanding of organisational culture and psychology of change, although largely descriptive and limited awareness of how these are put into practice.
|
Organisational culture and psychology of change is covered; however, it is largely descriptive and underdeveloped evaluatively.
|
Recognises the common issues around organisational culture and psychology of change but work is only partially evaluated with limited solutions/recommendations made as a result
|
Clear evidence of knowledge and understanding of organisational and psychology of change, which have been widely evaluated and a set of insightful observations made along with limited solutions/recommendations
|
Clear evidence of knowledge and understanding of organisational culture and psychology of change, which have been extensively evaluated and a set of insightful observations made along with a wide range of practical, feasible solutions and/or recommendations.
|
|
LO3: Evaluate models and theories on how HR professionals can, through commitment to [and practice of] compassion, humanity and fairness at work, create meaningful voice for others in the organisational decision-making process.
|
Fails to demonstrate any awareness of the topic with no critical evaluation.
|
Shows a very limited understanding of the topics, however, this is minimally evaluative and largely descriptive throughout the work.
|
Shows a limited understanding of the topics, however, this is minimally evaluative and largely descriptive throughout the work
|
Shows some evidence knowledge of the main theories around the topic, this is largely undeveloped throughout.
|
Overall, the major theories of the topic have been analysed to an extent, showing a satisfactory level of understanding of the topic. However, there are still areas that are underdeveloped or show a limited amount of critical evaluation.
|
Demonstrates a proficient level of understanding and wide critical analysis throughout, leading onto a considered set of practical solutions.
|
The work is of a high academic standard throughout, extensive evidence of the topic area which has been critically evaluated to lead to a comprehensive set of practical, feasible and commercial recommendations.
|
|
LO4: Analyse the major trends in inclusive HR working practices and processes, considering the role of collaborative relationships and their impact upon organisations, and people management practices and cultures.
|
Fails to demonstrate any awareness of the topic area within any organisation.
|
Demonstrates an inadequate awareness of the topic area within any organisation.
|
There is recognition of major trends (most common) however, this is largely descriptive and unassessed. Limited understanding of the impact upon organisations and people management practices and culture is achieved.
|
The major (more common) contributions in the topic area are covered, however, it is largely descriptive and underdeveloped evaluatively, leading to a limited understanding of the impact upon organisations and people management practises and culture.
|
A clear understanding of the topic area is shown throughout the work which leads to some interesting observations; however, it is limited in terms of assessment and evaluation
|
Wide evidence of recognition- and knowledge of the topic area is shown throughout the work. This leads to an insightful set of observations.
|
Extensive knowledge of the topic area which has been extensively evaluated. Academic and practical aspects are of a high calibre. Practical, commercial, and feasible recommendations have been made and fully justified.
|
Assurance of Learning Core Competencies
PG Template for AoL Core Competencies
|
|
Not Proficient
|
Not Yet Proficient
|
Proficient
|
Exceeded Threshold
|
|
Core Competency Title
|
0-39%
|
40-49%
|
50-59%
|
60-69%
|
70-79%
|
80-89%
|
|
CC7 collaboration
Evaluate teamworking and leadership effectiveness, respecting individual and cultural diversity
|
Can identify some characteristics of effective leadership and teamworking. Some analysis but no evaluation and/or recognition of individual and/or cultural diversity
|
Some evaluation of teamworking and leadership effectiveness, but incomplete and/or limited to generic/received views with limited attention to context; specifically relating to diversity and positionality.
|
Competent evaluation, analysing the main drivers and barriers to effective teamworking and leadership in the context of individual and cultural diversity. Role of reflexivity in leadership and management examined.
|
Critical evaluation of teamworking and the limits of leadership. Considers the broader contexts within which teams and leaders operate and situates their evaluation within discourse of responsible management education.
|
|
CC12 Adaptability
Appraise trends and their potential impact on own agency and effectiveness in the context of sustainability
|
Trends are not analysed but only identified. Have not engaged with the potential impacts and effectiveness. May not relate to sustainability
|
Have not engaged with one of the key elements such as sustainability. May have limited analysis of the trends or may not have demonstrated how the impacts relate to own agency and effectiveness
|
Have identified and discussed the trends. May not have fully engaged with all elements and potential impacts. Has analysed own agency and effectiveness although this may be limited. Sustainability context is reflected in the content however may not be fully embedded.
|
Trends are clearly identified and have been analysed. These are related to the impacts on agency and effectiveness. Sustainability is embedded within the analysis.
|
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions