This module is assessed through one graded element worth 100%. You must achieve at least 50% to pass the module. For this assignment you will produce a Business Consultancy Report based on Coca-Cola, written in an academic style.
2025-04-30 13:40:10
BPP Coursework Cover Sheet
Please use the table below as your cover sheet for the 1st page of the submission. The sheet should be before the cover/title page of your submission.
Programme
|
|
Module name
|
Management Essentials
|
Student Reference Number (SRN)
|
|
Report/Assignment Title
|
|
Date of Submission
(Please attach the confirmation of any extension received)
|
|
|
Declaration of Original Work:
§ I hereby declare that I have read and understood BPP’s regulations on plagiarism and that this is my original work, and that I have researched, undertaken, completed and submitted in accordance with the requirements of BPP School of Business.
- I declare that where I have used any AI tools, it was for the following reasons (highlight as appropriate):
- To review a draft
- To correct language errors
- Other (please describe)
I have copied & retained for BPP University’s reference, all AI prompts used in the creation of AI content and all AI-generated responses in support of my assignment and attached relevant evidence in the appendices.
I understand that I may be required to participate in a viva voce, where I will be questioned on any aspect of my assignment, including key concepts, theories, examples used, & any sources included.
The word count, excluding contents table, bibliography and appendices, is words.
Student Reference Number: Date:
|
MSc Management
Management Essentials
Coursework Assessment Brief CW2
1.General Assessment Guidance
- Your summative assessment for this module is made up of this coursework submission which accounts for 100% of the marks.
- Please note late submissions will not be marked.
- You are required to submit all elements of your assessment via Turnitin online access. Only submissions made via the specified mode will be accepted and hard copies or any other digital form of submissions (like via email or pen drive etc.) will not be accepted.
- For coursework, the submission word limit is 5000 words. You must comply with the word count guidelines. You may submit LESS than 5000 words but not more. Word Count guidelines can be found on your programme home page and the coursework submission page.
- Do not put your name or contact details anywhere on your submission. You should only put your student registration number (SRN) which will ensure your submission is recognised in the marking process.
- A total of 100 marks are available for this module assessment, and you are required to achieve minimum 50% to pass this module.
- You are required to use only Harvard Referencing System in your submission. Any content which is already published by other author(s) and is not referenced will be considered as a case of plagiarism.
You can find further information on Harvard Referencing in the online library on the Hub. You can use the following link to access this information: https://bpp.libguides.com/home/business
- BPP University has a strict policy regarding authenticity of assessments. In proven instances of plagiarism or collusion, severe punishment will be imposed on offenders. You are advised to read the rules and regulations regarding plagiarism and collusion in the GARs and UPPs which are available on the HUB in the Help and Support section under Documents and Forms.
- Use of AI in assessments is only allowed for the purposes of reviewing a draft, correcting language errors or if specified in the summative assessment brief. If you have used AI for any of these purposes, you should indicate this on the Assignment Cover sheet. For more information regarding acceptable and unacceptable use of AI, please enrol onto the Generative AI Foundations course on the HUB.
- You should include a completed copy of the Assignment Cover sheet. Any submission without this completed Assignment Cover sheet may be considered invalid and not marked.
2.Assessment Brief
This module is assessed through one graded element worth 100%. You must achieve at least 50% to pass the module. For this assignment you will produce a Business Consultancy Report based on Coca-Cola, written in an academic style.
By completing this assessment, you will achieve the following learning outcomes (LOs):
LO1 – Critically assess management practice within organisations.
LO2 – Apply your understanding of management principles in relation to key business challenges. LO3 – Critically evaluate how management behaviours can promote organisational success.
LO4 – Defend skills required to be an effective manager in a given business context.
Assessment Scenario
Acting as a Business Consultant you are required to produce a business report for the senior management team at Coca-Cola Co, by utilising the techniques and concepts you have covered in the module.
The Coca-Cola Company is one of the largest American corporations, and its iconic, eponymous beverage is the best-selling soft drink in the world. Through the years, the company has deployed memorable advertising in all media, the latest technology, and a model production and distribution system to increase and maintain its success.
IDENTIFICATION: Soft drink manufacturer and distributor DATE: Founded on January 29, 1892
On May 8, 1886, an Atlanta pharmacist, John Stith Pemberton, invented Coca-Cola syrup and mixed it with carbonated water to create a soda fountain drink. Pemberton’s bookkeeper, Frank Robinson, named the drink and designed the trademark, which would be registered in 1893. They sold the syrup to local soda fountains.
Before he died in 1888, Pemberton sold his business to several partners. By 1891, Atlanta pharmacist Asa G. Candler had acquired sole ownership for $2,300. On January 29, 1892, he formed the corporation, the Coca-Cola Company. Candler opened manufacturing plants in other states, and by 1895 Coca-Cola was sold throughout the United States. He also developed new marketing ideas, such as distributing coupons for free drinks, as well as selling calendars, clocks, and other souvenirs bearing the product’s trademark. In 1899, Candler gave Benjamin Thomas and Joseph Whitehead exclusive rights to bottle and distribute Coca-Cola. They developed high-speed bottling and a distribution system that became a model for the American soft drink industry.
In 1919, investors led by Ernest Woodruff and W. C. Bradley purchased the company for $25 million. In 1923, Ernest Woodruff’s son Robert Woodruff became president. During the 1920s, Woodruff introduced revolutionary merchandising tools such as a six-bottle carton and a metal, open-top cooler that enabled Coca-Cola to be sold ice-cold. He envisioned Coca-Cola as an international
product. The Summer Olympics of 1928 saw the first sale of Coca-Cola at an
Olympiad. The automatic fountain dispenser was introduced at the 1933 Chicago World’s Fair. During World War II , Woodruff built more plants overseas to supply the armed forces, and many non-Americans tasted Coca-Cola for the first time.
In the following decades, global recognition and sales grew, as the company developed successful packaging, marketing, and new products. In 1955, new ten-, twelve- and twenty-six-ounce “king- size” and “family-size” bottles became popular, and plastic two-litre bottles arrived in 1977. The company’s advertising slogans have been among the most recognized in American culture. They have included "It’s the Real Thing" (1942, 1969), "Coke Is It!" (1982), "The Coke Side of Life" (2006), "Open Happiness" (2009), "Taste the Feeling" (2016), and "Real Magic" (2021). While Coca-Cola (sometimes sold as Coke) remained the company’s flagship product, by the early twenty-first century the company produced and distributed more than 3,500 beverage products among hundreds of brands available in more than two hundred countries.
At the same time, the company did experience some industry competition that also influenced marketing strategies and product development. PepsiCo had long served as Coca-Cola`s biggest rival, with its flagship beverage, Pepsi, drawing in a share of customers who preferred a slightly sweeter soft drink. As part of an effort to take sales back from PepsiCo, Coca-Cola leadership made the decision to tweak their soft drink`s signature formula and, in 1985, replace traditional Coca-Cola with the new formulation, offering only the latter for sale instead. While many loyal customers criticised this move and PepsiCo attempted to capitalize off such backlash, the company did continue to make a profit overall. Still, the response led Coca-Cola to sell both the classic version of Coke and the new version of Coke.
In addition to sponsoring various major organisations and events, including the National Basketball Association (NBA), the National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing (NASCAR), the television
series American Idol , and the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), the Coca-Cola company has changed its marketing strategies over the years to continue appealing to a wide range of consumers. While Diet Coke was released to the market in 1982 to offer a sugar-free version of the company`s iconic beverage, it was not until 2005 that another diet product was released to target a more elusive segment of the increasingly health-conscious American population: men. That year, Coca-Cola began selling Coke Zero, which also contained the artificial sweetener aspartame but came in a black can and was meant to taste almost identical to the original. This product successfully appealed to men as well and the company saw growth in sales over the subsequent years. In a further effort to compete in a market whose consumers were leaning more toward low-calorie options, the company unveiled Coca-Cola Life in 2014. Sweetened through the use of cane sugar and the natural stevia plant, the soft drink boasted only 90 calories per green can. However, diet soda sales began struggling in the 2010s due to increased consumer concerns regarding the consumption of sugar substitutes. Also in 2014, Coca-Cola initiated its "Share a Coke" campaign, replacing its logo on the labels of its cans and bottles for the first time with some of the country`s most popular names to add a personal touch to the beverage`s packaging. After experiencing some success, the company continued the campaign in 2015 with a wider variety of packaging and including one thousand different names.
Just as transitions to more health-conscious foods and beverages had prompted the release of new products, Coca-Cola also remained aware of the public`s interest in alcoholic beverages, particularly as the market for ready-to-drink cocktails grew. As soda consumption had continued to decline, the
year 2018 had seen the company`s experimentation with a ready-to- drink
alcoholic beverage sold in Japan. By the 2020s, the company had made further moves into the alcohol industry, particularly with the release, in partnership with the major whiskey maker Jack Daniel`s, of the canned Jack and Coke cocktail. First for sale in Mexico in 2022, the cans became available in other countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom in 2023. By that point, Coca-Cola had also introduced alcoholic versions of its Fresca brand as well as a line of hard seltzers. At the same time, its attempt to enter the energy drink market with the launch of its own brand in 2020 had proven unsuccessful.
Case study can also be found here:
Myers, A. (2024) ‘Coca-Cola Company’, Salem Press Encyclopedia [Preprint]. Available at: https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=2e7690cb-10eb-3e85-87e3-2ffce7209a21 (Accessed: 14 November 2024).
It is recommended that you should carry out a substantial amount of independent and individual research to strengthen your understanding of the business context and the preferred style of management practice.
Assessment Task
You are to critically evaluate the current management practices at Coca-Cola Corporation and recommend changes based on your evaluation that company must implement to improve its success in the Beverage sector.
Task 1 – Management Practices (LO1)
Conduct a comprehensive analysis of Coca-Cola’s management practices, describing their key aspects and critically assess these management practices.
Support your arguments with reference to appropriate academic literature, case study materials and your independent research.
Task 2 – Analysis of Business Challenges (LO2)
Identify significant business challenges faced by Coca-Cola. Apply relevant management principles to analyse how Coca-Cola addressed these challenges.
Support your arguments with reference to appropriate academic literature, case study materials and your independent research.
Task 3 – Impact of Management Behaviours on Organisational Performance (LO3)
Critically evaluate the potential impact of Coca-Cola’s managers’ behaviour on the overall
organisation’s performance.
Support your arguments with reference to appropriate academic literature, case study materials and your independent research.
Task 4 – Management competencies development (LO4)
Critically assess different management competencies and defend why these skills are important for current and future managers at Coca-Cola to improve its success in the Beverage industry.
Support your arguments with reference to appropriate academic literature, case study materials and your independent research.
Assessment Guidelines:
Introduction
- Define leadership and management and provide an overview of the purpose of your report including an indication of the contents.
Task 1 – Management Practices
- Identify Coca-Cola’s mission, values and management practices.
- Critically assess whether Coca-Cola’s mission, values and management practices are all aligned.
Task 2 – Analysis of Business Challenges
- Identify and critically discuss 2 key challenges that Coca-Cola is encountering in the current environment.
- Conduct an analysis of Coca-Cola’s current management competency of Creativity and Innovation using relevant model/ framework.
- Critically discuss effectiveness of Coca-Cola’s current management competency of Creativity and Innovation to enable Coca-Cola’s management to resolve the challenges identified.
- Analyse the Coca-Cola’s management competency of Decision making using relevant model/ framework.
- Critically evaluate how effectively the management competency of Decision-making is being used in mitigating the challenges identified.
- Analyse the emotional intelligence of Coca-Cola’s managers using relevant model/framework.
- Analyse the positive and negative effects of these behaviours on Coca-Cola’s performance.
- Give recommendations for cultivating or modifying these management behaviours to enhance Coca-Cola’s success.
Task 3 – Impact of Management Behaviours on Organisational Performance
Task 4 – Management competencies development
- Select any 2 management competencies from the following and critically assess the selected competencies using relevant models/ frameworks.
- Managing Resilience
- Managing Stakeholder Relationships
- Managing Conflict and Negotiation
- Managing Teams
- Propose recommendations for developing and nurturing these skills among current and future managers at Coca-Cola to improve its success in the Beverage Industry.
Conclusion
Provide a conclusion that summarises your recommended changes that Coca-Cola must implement to improve its success in the Beverage industry.
Presentation and Referencing
Your report structure should include the following sections:
- Cover page (BPP University Administration Cover Sheet)
- Table of Contents
- List of Abbreviations (if appropriate)
- Introduction
- Task 1
- Task 2
- Task 3
- Task 4
- Conclusion
- References
- Appendix (if required)
Word count: 5000 words
Word count – only applies to the main body (shown in bold); i.e., cover page, table of contents, list of abbreviations, references, assessment self-evaluation and appendix are not part of the 5000-word count.
If you have any further questions about this coursework assignment, please contact the module leader or your tutor.
Tip for Mapping the Assessment towards Module Topics and Module Learning Outcomes (LOs)
Assessment Task
|
Module Topic
|
Suggested Word Count
|
Module LOs
|
Task 1 -
Management Practice
|
Module Overview and Introduction (Topic 0)
|
Up to 1200
|
LO1 – Critically assess
management practice within organisations.
|
Task 2 – Analysis of Business Challenges
|
Managing Yourself -Creativity (Topic 1)
Managing Yourself - Decision-Making (Topic 2)
|
Up to 1200
|
L02 – Apply your understanding of management principles in
relation to key business challenges.
|
Task 3 - Impact of Management Behaviours on Organisational Performance
|
Managing Yourself - Emotional Intelligence (Topic 3)
|
Up to 1200
|
L03 – Critically evaluate how management behaviours can promote organisational success.
|
Task 4 – Management Competencies Development
|
Managing Yourself - Resilience (Topic 4) Managing Relationships - Stakeholders (Topic 5) Managing Relationships- Conflict and Negotiation (Topic 6)
Managing Teams -Teamwork (Topic 7)
|
Up to 1200
|
L04 – Defend skills required to be an effective manager in a given business context.
|
Presentation and Structure Introduction Conclusion
|
See Marking Guide in Section 3
|
100
100
|
|
|
|
5000
|
|
3. Marking Guide
The assignment is marked out of 100 and counts towards 100% of your module mark. The following table shows the tasks, marks and marking rubric:
Criterion
|
0-39%
|
40-49%
|
50-59%
|
60-69%
|
70-79%
|
80-100%
|
Fail
|
Marginal Fail
|
Pass
|
Merit
|
Distinction
|
High Distinction
|
LO1 –
|
Inadequate, weak
|
Limited
|
Satisfactory
|
Good level of critical
|
Excellent level of
|
Outstanding
|
Critically
|
or no
|
understanding and
|
understanding and
|
assessment and
|
critical assessment,
|
level of critical
|
assess
|
understanding and
|
critical assessment of
|
critical assessment of
|
understanding of
|
showcasing in-depth
|
assessment and
|
management
|
critical assessment
|
management
|
management
|
management
|
understanding and
|
comprehensive
|
practice
|
of management
|
practices within
|
practices within
|
practices within
|
insight into
|
understanding of
|
within
|
practices within
|
organisations.
|
organisations.
|
organisations.
|
management
|
management
|
organisations.
|
organisations.
|
The discussion has
|
The discussion has
|
The discussion is
|
practices within
|
practices within
|
|
The discussion is
|
limited evidence
|
satisfactory evidence
|
well-supported by
|
organisations.
|
organisations,
|
|
weak and lacks
|
from academic
|
from academic
|
evidence from
|
The discussion is
|
displaying
|
|
evidence from
|
literature to support
|
literature to support
|
academic literature.
|
strong with well-
|
exceptional
|
|
academic literature
|
the arguments or
|
the arguments or
|
The analysis
|
structured argument
|
insight and
|
|
to support the
|
claims made. The
|
claims made.
|
demonstrates a good
|
that is convincing and
|
depth.
|
|
arguments or
|
use of sources might
|
The analysis
|
understanding of the
|
well-supported by a
|
Answer pushes
|
|
claims made.
|
be inconsistent, and
|
demonstrates a basic
|
topic and effectively
|
wide range of sources
|
the boundaries of
|
|
Inadequate or no
|
there may be gaps in
|
understanding of the
|
integrates relevant
|
and/or evidence.
|
existing
|
|
use of sources, and
|
providing relevant
|
topic and
|
citations and
|
Explores the
|
knowledge.
|
|
there may be gaps
|
citations or
|
incorporates
|
references
|
boundaries of existing
|
Outstanding
|
|
in providing
|
references.
|
relevant citations to
|
throughout. The
|
knowledge.
|
evidence of
|
|
relevant citations
|
|
support arguments
|
sources used are
|
Evidence of extensive
|
original,
|
|
or references.
|
|
and claims. The
|
varied and
|
reading and use of
|
independent and
|
|
|
|
sources used are
|
demonstrate a
|
sources/material in
|
critical thought.
|
|
|
|
appropriate and contribute to the
|
breadth of research.
|
support of the work.
|
Evidence of extensive reading
|
|
|
|
overall credibility of
|
|
|
and perfect use
|
|
|
|
the report.
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sources/material
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in support of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
work.
|
L02 – Apply your understanding of management principles in relation to key business challenges.
|
Inadequate or weak understanding of the key business challenges.
Inadequate or weak application of management principles to address the challenges identified.
|
Limited understanding of the key business challenges.
Limited application of management principles to address the challenges identified.
|
Satisfactory understanding of the key business challenges.
Satisfactory application of management principles to address the challenges identified.
|
Good understanding of the key business challenges.
Good application of management principles to address the challenges identified.
|
Excellent level of understanding and good identification of the key business challenges.
Excellent analysis and application of management principles to address the challenges identified.
|
Outstanding level of understanding and correct identification of the key business challenges.
Outstanding application of management principles to address the challenges
identified.
|
L03 – Critically evaluate how management behaviours can promote organisational success.
|
Weak or no critical evaluation of the management behaviours which can promote organisational success.
Student has made no or wrong attempt to use the theories, literature or examples and unable to apply them to the case study.
|
Limited critical evaluation of the management behaviours which can promote organisational success.
Student has made limited attempt to use the theories, literature or examples and applied them to the case study.
|
Satisfactory critical evaluation of the management behaviours which can promote organisational success.
Student has made satisfactory attempt to use the theories, literature or examples and applied them to the case study.
|
Good critical evaluation of the management behaviours which can promote organisational success.
Student has made good attempt to use the theories, literature or examples and applied them to the case study.
|
Excellent critical evaluation of the management behaviours which can promote good level of organisational success.
Student has made excellent attempt to use the theories, literature or examples and applied them to the case study. The discussion is fairly supported by evidence from academic literature.
|
Outstanding critical evaluation of the management behaviours which can promote high level of organisational success.
Student has made outstanding attempt to use the theories, literature or examples and applied them to the case study.
The discussion is
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exceptionally well-supported by evidence from academic literature.
The sources used are varied and demonstrate breadth of research.
|
L04 – Defend skills required to be an effective manager in a given business context.
|
Inadequate or weak critical assessment and analysis of skills required to be an effective manager in a given business context.
Student has made no or wrong attempt to use the theories, literature or examples and was unable to apply them to the case study.
|
Limited critical assessment and analysis of skills required to be an effective manager in a given business context.
Student has made limited attempt to use the theories, literature or examples and limited or no application to the case study.
|
Satisfactory critical assessment and analysis of different skills required to be an effective manager in a given business context.
Student has made satisfactory attempt to use the theories, literature or examples and applied them to the case study.
|
Good critical evaluation of different skills required to be an effective manager in a given business context.
Student has made good attempt to use the theories, literature or examples and applied them to the case study.
|
Excellent critical assessment and analysis of 3 different skills required to be an effective manager in a given business context.
Student has made excellent attempt to use relevant literature or examples and applied them to the case study.
|
Outstanding critical assessment and analysis of 4 relevant skills required to be an effective manager in a given business context.
Student has made outstanding attempt to use the theories, literature or examples and applied them to the case study.
|
Academic skills
|
Inadequate or weak academic/ intellectual skills with some difficulties. Largely imitative and descriptive. Some difficulty with structure and accuracy in expression but developing practical/professio nal skills.
|
Limited academic/intellectua l skills. Original work with personal reflection and broad evidence-based critique. Solid structure and accuracy in expression.
Practical/professiona l skills evident.
|
Satisfactory academic/intellectua l skills. Wholly original work with good reflection and solid, well-reasoned judgements forming from evidence-based critique. Consistent structure and accuracy in expression.
Practical/professiona l skills established.
|
Good academic/intellectua l skills. Demonstrates intellectual originality and imagination
|
Excellent academic/intellectual skills. Demonstrates intellectual originality, integrity, coherence and imagination.
|
Outstanding academic/intellec tual skills.
Demonstrates intellectual originality, integrity, coherence, creativity and imagination working consistently in the higher cognitive domains to a professional
standard.
|
Referencing
|
Inadequate or weak references and notes but may contain inconsistencies, errors or
omissions.
|
Limited and full and appropriate references and notes with minor or insignificant errors
|
Satisfactory with precise, full and appropriate references and notes.
|
Good with precise, full and appropriate references and notes at a high standard.
|
Excellent with precise, full and appropriate references and notes at near-publishing standard.
|
Outstanding with precise, full and appropriate references and notes at publishing
standard.
|
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions