Critically analyse the different requirements of a leader and manager, recommending two new approaches that the organisation might take to help identify their development needs.

 

7LD02 Leadership and management development context

Student Assessment Brief

Assessment ID / CIPD_7LD02_24_01

 Level 7 Advanced Diploma in

  • Strategic Learning and Development

Level 7 Advanced Diploma 

Introduction

Your knowledge and understanding of the material covered in this specialist unit will be assessed through your answers to four questions.

You will write four answers of approximately 1000 words to the questions posed and submit them together in a single document. This constitutes your assessment for this unit. The total word count for the assessment will therefore be 4000 words, plus or minus 10%. The bibliography, list of references and essential appendixes (if applicable) are not included in the total word count – but the latter must be kept to a minimum.

You must demonstrate within the submitted evidence (through headings and sub-headings) which learning outcomes and assessment criteria have been cited. We are unable to moderate your work if this is not included.

As this is an Advanced Diploma, it is important that you are able to demonstrate not only good knowledge and understanding of the material associated with each learning outcome, but also the ability to develop an original argument and justify it persuasively with reference to wider reading. Examples of approaches taken in a range of organisations are also an effective means by which to justify your arguments.

The six main criteria that CIPD requires centres to use when marking your assessment are outlined below, but it may be that not all these criteria are present in every question.

(1)  focus

(2)  depth and breadth of understanding

(3)  strategic application and professional advice

(4)  research and wider reading

(5)  persuasiveness and originality

(6)  presentation and language 

Assessment questions

Level 7 Advanced Diploma

You are involved with the planning of a CPD day for leaders and managers within your organisation and have been asked by this team to update them on some of the more contemporary thinking about their development.

They have particular interest in certain areas and have asked for responses to the following questions.

For the purpose of this assessment, you need to apply your answers to either your own organisation or one with which you are familiar.

It is essential that your reading of the published literature is used to inform your responses to all questions.

Question 1 (AC 1.4)

Critically analyse the different requirements of a leader and manager, recommending two new approaches that the organisation might take to help identify their development needs. 

Question 2 (AC 2.4)

Analyse the role of continuing professional development for the organisation’s leaders and managers, recommending two different approaches that could be implemented to effectively achieve this.

Question 3 (AC 3.1)

Evaluate three forms of data analytics that the organisation could use as evidence to measure the effectiveness of any future leadership and management development programmes.

Question 4 (AC 4.2)

Contrast how leaders and managers working globally for micro multinationals and small medium enterprises can be developed, considering the challenges associated with this.

Marking Grid

Level 7 Advanced Diploma

The student will receive a Pass, Merit, Distinction or Refer/Fail result at unit level. Assessors must provide a mark from 1 to 4 for each Learning Outcome in the unit.

To pass the unit assessment the student must achieve a 2 (Pass) or above for each of the learning outcomes.

The overall mark achieved will dictate the grade the student receives for the unit, provided NONE

of the learning outcomes have been failed or referred. 

Overall mark

Unit result

0 to 7

Refer / Fail

8 or 9

Pass

10 to 13

Merit

14 to 16

Distinction

 The student results should be recorded in a marking grid similar to the example below.

Marking grid:

Learning outcome

Mark

 

LO1

2

LO2

3

LO3

3

LO4

2

Overall mark

10

 

Unit Result

MeritLevel 7 Advanced Diploma

  

Generic grade descriptors

 

REFER/FAIL / 1

 

PASS / 2

 

MERIT / 3

 

DISTINCTION / 4

Focus

Fails to address all the questions either sufficiently fully or directly.

An adequate attempt to address all the questions fully and directly.

A good attempt to address all the questions relatively well and directly.

An excellent attempt to address all the questions very well and directly.

Depth & breadth of understanding

Inadequate knowledge and understanding in respect of one or more of the questions. Limited depth and breadth of analysis.

Adequate knowledge and understanding across the questions. Satisfactory breadth and depth of analysis.

Full and solid knowledge and understanding across all the questions. Good breadth and depth of analysis.

Very full knowledge and understanding across all the questions. Excellent breadth and depth of analysis.

Strategic application & professional advice

Fails to provide appropriate or well-justified advice and/or recommendations. Lacks a strategic approach.

Provides adequately justified advice and informed recommendations. Some strategic application.

Provides solid and thoughtful advice and well-informed recommendations. Clearly strategic in orientation.

Provides excellent advice and very well-informed recommendations. Strategically oriented in all respects.

Research & wider reading

Limited original research and/or appropriate wider reading for the assignment. Limited or no referencing.

Evidence of sufficient research and appropriate wider reading for the assignment. Satisfactory in- text referencing.

Evidence of significant research and thoughtful, appropriate wider reading for the assignment. A good standard of in-text referencing.

Evidence of considerable research and excellent, appropriate wider reading for the assignment. An excellent standard of in-text referencing

Persuasiveness & originality

Limited development of persuasive and original arguments. Inadequate use of examples.

An adequate attempt to develop original arguments and to justify these persuasively. Includes appropriate examples.

Some strong original arguments are presented which are mainly justified persuasively. Good use of examples.

Mostly strong original arguments are presented and justified very persuasively. Excellent use of examples.

Presentation & language

An inadequate standard of presentation or language. The assignment is poorly written and/or poorly structured. It is not at the level required for a management presentation.

A solid standard of presentation and use of language. The structure and ideas are satisfactory for a management presentation.

A strong and professional standard of presentation and use of language. The structure and ideas are well crafted for a management presentation.

An outstanding standard of presentation and use of language. The structure and ideas are very well crafted for a management presentation.

 

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions