Truce (she/her) is a UK-based music practitioner who has been creating music and poetry since 2001. She has collaborated with multiple musicians

1.   Assignment Brief 25/26: 5LW009 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 

Topic

Detail

Academic year / semester

Semester 1

Module code and title

5LW009 Intellectual Property Law

Module Leader

Dr Metka Potočnik

Assignment name

Coursework

Assignment type

Coursework

Assignment weighting and size

100%

2,500 words, +/- 10% (references and bibliography are not included in this word count)

Assessment unpacking video location

Canvas – Week 12 Revision

‘What’s my assignment?’ unpacking date (if

applicable)

Week 12 – Revision (last week of Semester 1 teaching period)

Formative submission date (if applicable)

Week 5 (Formative 1), and Week 11 (Formative 2).

Formative submission method (if applicable)

Coursework – via Canvas

(two opportunities: one for problem-solving-questions, and one for essays)

Formative feedback date (if applicable)

End of week 6, and end of week 12.

Summative (i.e., final) submission date

Monday, 5 January 2026, 2pm

Summative submission method

Online in Canvas.

Assignment requirements

Students must answer two questions (out of the total six), and they must answer one question from Part A, and one question from Part B.

 

Students must reference all legal authorities supporting their legal analysis and argumentation. All references must be made in footnotes and must follow the Oxford Rules of Citation for Law (OSCOLA).

 

See Assessment Questions Below.

 

 

Topic

Detail

Learning outcomes

Learning Outcome 1 (LO1)

Identify legal principles and tests appropriate to a given legal issue and illustrate their applicability to subsistence of an intellectual property right in a work.

Learning Outcome 2 (LO2)

Evaluate trends in the modern development of Intellectual Property Law topics studied in the module and be able to appraise rationale justifying protection of intellectual property by reference to primary legal sources and to the views of learned writers.

Learning Outcome 3 (LO3)

Interpret a range of data including textual, numerical and statistical demonstrating an awareness of the context of intellectual property law.

Assessment criteria

(see rubric below for performance criteria)

All LOs are assessed in this Coursework assignment.

 

For detail, please see the Rubric attached below.

Characteristics of a good submission

See assessment unpacking (Week 12 – assessment clinic).

 

Please see the Rubric for detailed guidance below.

Additional instructions

Always keep a copy of your drafts and a file of working documents. There may be circumstances – for example, if there are questions relating to the academic integrity of your work – where you may be asked to submit the evidence of your work and meet with your tutor to answer questions about your submission.

Professional Body requirements

PRSB

University regulations

University’s Academic Regulations

Academic Integrity Policy Level and Mark Descriptors

Support

Student Support and Wellbeing Study Guides

Skills for Learning – Introduction to Academic Study Skills Academic English Language Skills

You should also refer to your Course and Module Guides

 

Topic

Detail

 

 

Date by which feedback will be provided

After 4 weeks of the submission (all iterations).

Feedback format

Written (on the coursework documents submitted, in track changes and with comments (redline)).

Resit details

The resit will occur in the Easter resit period. Here, the questions will remain the same, and students are asked to improve their answers, in line with the feedback provided to them regarding their first attempt.

The due date is Monday, 30 March 2026.

1.1.Asessment Questions 

ANSWER TWO QUESTIONS: You must answer ONE Question from PART A AND ONE Question from PART B. 

All questions carry equal marks

PART A:

Question 1:

Truce (she/her) is a UK-based music practitioner who has been creating music and poetry since 2001. She has collaborated with multiple musicians in the past and is well-known for her musical innovation and non-commercial music. In 2020, Truce worked in the West Midlands, where she recorded sounds of animal and human life, to be later incorporated in her works. Some of the songs were applauded by her audiences for musical innovation, but there were also critics who argued that her works are not musical, because they are mere recordings of “street life.” In one of the pieces, Truce worked together with a local poet Joey (they/them) to write the lyrics to the piece “Wireless Humanity.” Since publishing the song in 2021, multiple charity organisations reached out to Truce and Joey, asking to use their song in campaigning on climate change. Truce and Joey have always responded to these requests, granting permission to all not-for-profit organisations, who use their music in relation to climate change work.

[Continued on the next page.]

 

Truce (she/her) and Joey (they/them) are seeking advice from you with respect to the following, unrelated situations: 

a)Aysha (they/them) is a student at the University of Wolverhampton, studying film studies. In their final project Aysha submitted an original documentary about the life of people in Wolverhampton, which includes recordings from their town, to their tutors, for assessment purposes. The title of the documentary is “W Humanity.” They were inspired by the works of Truce, but some critics have found the works to be very similar. Aysha’s documentary was also published on their website in 2024 and has been viewed 10,000 times since its publication.

b)A Wolverhampton-based business, “the W Café” organised an evening of local poetry, storytelling and comedy. One of the artists there, Sarah, played Truce and Joey’s song “Wireless Humanity.” The performance was recorded by the W Café’s owner, Sam, who posted the recording on the W Café’s website and social media accounts, (i.e. Instagram), for promotional purposes. The Café’s website received many comments from Truce’s fans, asking about her connection to this local business. They were concerned that the W Café does not source their materials locally, increasing their carbon footprint. Truce and Joey were not approached for permission.

c)Vikram (he/him) is a filmmaker and a journalist, who explores social justice issues in the West Midlands. In a 2023 documentary, Vikram used Truce and Joey’s song “Wireless Humanity” in the background, whilst criticising the opaque and inefficient policies of the West Midlands Combined Authority on waste management and the environment. Truce and Joey were not approached for permission.

Question 2

Solar Solutions Ltd is a renewable energy company, based in Coventry. Since 2005 they have successfully developed several solar energy generators, which have now become sector leading and an industry standard. In 2008 they have registered “Solar Solutions” and “Sun Energy” for generators and electrical equipment, selling services and marketing. With increased competition, Solar Solutions are investing heavily in brand recognition, which has been appreciated by specialised media and industry bodies. In 2024, Solar Solutions have also registered a logo of a “sun character, dressed in a jumpsuit, using electrical tools.” The character of the sun is registered in a bright yellow, Pantone no. 1225 C, with the features drawn out in black, Pantone no. 6 C.

Solar Solutions Ltd wants your advice on the following, unrelated situations:

a)Speed Climate Ltd is a company based in Birmingham, operating since the 1990s. In their work they use a variety of materials and since 2020, they have expanded their work into renewable energy. When their clients ask for it, they design bespoke energy efficient solutions. Their energy efficient products are sold under the name “Solar Fixes” and the logo of a sun character, who carries a range of their tools in their bag.

b)Robert runs a family-owned business, which renovates old houses and businesses. One of his unique selling points is that all their refurbishment is done to the highest energy efficient standards and latest trends, compliant with climate change. Robert advertises their services under the name “Solar’s Solutions.”

c)Shade Jackets Inc are a company based in Durham. In 2022 they have started selling “Sun Energy” jackets and other clothing, which they advertise to be suitable for hiking and any extreme sports, where users might need climate control clothing. The products are however not of the best quality and many consumers have sent in their complaints since the products were first put on the market.

PART B:

Question 3

“Protecting intellectual property rights in the online environment is a difficult balancing act.”

Critically discuss the liability of online intermediaries for IP infringement in the United Kingdom, with relevant references to the either copyright or trade mark statutes, case law and the literature.

Question 4

“Business goodwill in the United Kingdom is best protected by registered trade marks, not the common law tort of passing off.”

Do you agree with this statement? Critically discuss the above statement, with relevant references to the trade mark statute, case law and the literature.

Question 5

“Patent law must balance among several stakeholders’ interests, to ‘to the mutual advantage of producers and users of technological knowledge and in a manner conducive to social and economic welfare, and to a balance of rights and obligations.’ (Article 7 of the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights 1994 (TRIPS)).” 

Critically discuss the above statement, with relevant references to the United Kingdom patent statute, case law and the literature.

END OF PAPER.


1.2. Assessment Rubric (appended below).

 

70-100%

Excellent Standard

69-60%

Very Good Standard

59-50%

Good Standard

49-40%

Sufficient Standard

39-0%

Insufficient Standard

LO1 Identify legal principles and tests appropriate to a given legal issue and illustrate their applicability to subsistence of an intellectual property right in a work.

 

 

[30 points]

 

 

Identification and application of the Law

Identifies all legal principles and tests relevant to the legal issues and applies them in the context of the relevant IP right in the question.

 

 

[20-30 points]

Identifies most legal principles and tests relevant to the legal issues and applies them in the context of the relevant IP right in the question.

 

 

[20-17 points]

Identifies several legal principles and tests relevant to the legal issues and applies them in the context of the relevant IP right in the question.

 

 

[17-14 points]

Identifies only some legal principles and tests relevant to the legal issues and moderately applies them in the context of the relevant IP right in the question.

 

 

[14-11 points]

Does not identify sufficient legal principles and tests relevant to the legal issues and applies them in the context of the relevant IP right in the question or there are serious errors in application and understanding of the law.

 

 

 

 

 

[0-11 points]

LO2 Evaluate

Identifies all

Identifies most

Identifies

Identifies

Demonstrates

trends in the

relevant trends

relevant trends

several trends

some trends

understanding

modern

and structure

and structure

and structure

and structure

of

development of

of IP Law,

of IP Law,

of IP Law,

of IP Law, but

“evaluation”

Intellectual

theories of IP

theories of IP

theories of IP

also includes

but actual

Property Law

law and

law and explicit

law and explicit

some

analysis of

topics studied in

numerous

and implicit

assumptions.

irrelevant or

trends

the module, and

explicit and

biases.

 

non-existent

emphasises

be able to

implicit

 

 

elements of IP

irrelevant or

appraise

assumptions

 

 

Law.

non-existent

rationale

and potential

 

 

 

elements of IP

justifying

biases.

 

 

 

Law.

protection of

 

 

 

 

 

intellectual

 

 

 

 

 

property by

 

 

 

 

 

reference to

 

 

 

 

 

 

primary legal sources and to the views of learned writers.

[30 points] 

Legal Academic Scholarship

 

 

 

 

 

LO3 Interpret a range of data including textual

, numerical and statistical demonstrating an awareness of the context of intellectual property law.

 

 

[30 points]

Synthesises the interpretation, analysis and evaluation into an original and highly persuasive conclusion about IP Law and demonstrates considerable inventiveness or originality.

Synthesises the interpretation, analysis and evaluation into an original and highly persuasive conclusion about IP Law.

Synthesises the interpretation, analysis and evaluation into an original and persuasive conclusion about IP Law.

Synthesises the interpretation, analysis and evaluation into a reasonable, yet descriptive conclusion about IP Law.

Demonstrates understanding of “synthesis” but actual synthesis is lacking, or not original, persuasive, reasonable or ingenious.

Critical Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

Academic Rigour

 

 

The robustness of the academic scholarship, and recognition of academic best practices.

[10 points]

An impressive range of relevant sources of used, correctly attributed and referenced (OSCOLA).

 

 

[6-10 points]

A very good range of relevant sources used, and correctly attributed and referenced.

 

 

[6-5 points]

A good range of relevant sources used, and mostly correctly attributed and referenced.

 

 

[5-4 points]

Several relevant sources used, and with several correct attributions and a fair attempt of following the referencing

rules.

Does not use relevant sources and has a poor application of the attribution and referencing standards.

 

 

 

 

 

[0-3 points]

 

 

 

 

[3-4 points]

  

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions