You are required to submit a portfolio containing two elements, as detailed below, which together count for 100% of the module assessment.

FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT, LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

DEVELOPING SKILLS FOR BUSINESS LEADERSHIP, HRM7503A

Semester 1 2023/24 SUBMISSION DEADLINE: tbc

COURSEWORK BRIEF

This module is assessed by coursework alone.You are required to submit a portfolio containing two elements, as detailed below, which together count for 100% of the module assessment.The report comprises no more than 2000 words.You will receive formal feedback on your submission through Canvas following the completion of the first and second marking process.order now

The purpose of the portfolio is for you to explore and reflect upon your own learning and development. As this is a portfolio you need to submit ONLY what is stated below. No credit will be given for additional elements around this.This includes any form of introduction or conclusion – these are not required and will not be marked – submit only the requirements stated as numbered below.

PART 1: Continuing Professional Development Action Plan (50% of overall module mark).

This part of your portfolio should contain two elements:

1.1 A continuing professional development action plan for the 12 months following submission of this assessment.

1.2 A discussion and commentary on why the plan is relevant to you and the challenges you will face in delivering your plan.

Your action plan should focus on the specific areas of development that you want to address. You are responsible for identifying the area of focus in your action plan. This is about YOUR development and the skills you need to succeed – what is being assessed is the quality, credibility, and critical nature of the plan and commentray you submit, and part of this is therefore about selecting and justifying the development relevant to you.

As this is resubmission of your plan you are expected that the plan should be updated for and dated from the point of submission.

This action plan and commentray should include the following features:

· It needs to express your purpose and intended outcomes; there is a strong link between your motivation and the likelihood of success.

· It should be more encompassing than ‘just’ completing your modules and/or degree – this is a given – plans should be complementary to this.

· It needs to be written in precise terms, following a rigorous and systematic analysis of your current situation and developmental needs.

· An indication of how you would monitor each activity or progress goal and ensure it contributes to the final outcome stated.

· It should not rely solely upon one course of action to achieve a goal. If you have a range of options and activities available, you will be less likely to be deterred by unexpected challenges or obstacles.

· It should consider ultimate long-term goals and the steps that you will take towards these. A good plan therefore includes both progress goals, which act as milestones, and outcome goals, to achieve your ultimate purpose. Progress goals may be priority sub-skills. For example, you could identify voice projection as a skill which contributes to the overall goal of improved presentation skills.

It is expected that your action plan will be presented as a table and as such will not contribute to the word count of the assignment.

Your commentary (1.2) is expected to explain the focus and direction taken in your plan and discuss the impact of and lessons learned from your prior learning activities and how these feed into your plan and the challenges and barriers you might face (personally and professionally) in undertaking your action plan and identify how these may be minimised. The focus throughout should be on critical consideration of your development activities and the learning from these.

You are required to submit a portfolio containing two elements, as detailed below, which together count for 100% of the module assessment.

PART 2: Reflective Account (50% of overall module mark)

This should address the experience of studying on your MSc in general, this module and the business simulation in particular. The intention is to consider your experiences of engaging in this developmental activity.The reflective account is your opportunity to demonstrate your ability to learn from experience through analysis and look ahead to consider how it may be useful to you in the future. This should be a personal account and therefore written in the first person (‘I’). A good reflective account will link to the content of Part 1 of this assessment in a considered and detailed way. Again if this is a resubmission it is expected that you will reflect on the feedback from the original submission as part of this.

If this is resubmission of your plan you are expected to discuss your response to the feedback on the original submission in your reflective account. If you failed to engage or participate in the simulation you account should include consideration as to why and what you might do, in the future, to avoid missing out on key/critical developmental opportunities that are presented to you.

Format

A single portfolio should be submitted containing both elements and these should be clearly separated from each other, with clear and appropriate titles. Start each element on a new page. This should be a personal account and therefore written in the first person (‘I’). You are expected to split the 2000 word limit for the assignment in approximately equal proportion to the weightings of the assessment indicated above. As indicated, it is NOT necessary to include an overall introduction and conclusion for your portfolio; however, both parts should be properly and appropriately structured and the logic and structure of each element should be clear to the reader. It is a key skill of effective learning and development to be able to order and structure your thinking and learning. This is a skill being tested here as well.our samples

MARKING CRITERIA

HRM7503-A

Outstanding/ Excellent

(70% or above)

 

Very Good

(69-60%)

 

Good

(59-50%)

Satisfactory

(49-40%)

Significant fail

(39-30%)

Substantial fail

(29% or under)

CONTINUING DEVELOPMENT PLAN & COMMENTARY (50%)

 

Plans are extensive and effectively presented. Commentary offers comprehensive critical insight into development undertaken and in-depth and critical justification for the focus/skills area adopted and detailed critical and time sensitive discussion of its feasibility and barriers and challenges in undertaking the action plan. Shows clear evidence that approach is informed by relevant literature and wider reading.

Plans are effectively presented. Commentary offers critical insight into development undertaken and justification for the focus/skills area adopted and critical and time sensitive discussion of its feasibility and barriers and challenges in undertaking the action plan as outlined. Shows evidence that approach is informed by relevant literature and wider reading.

 

Plans are reasonably presented. Commentary offers Some critical insight into development undertaken and some justification for the focus/skills area adopted and some critical and time sensitive discussion of its feasibility and barriers and challenges in undertaking the action plan as outlined. Shows some evidence that approach is informed by relevant literature and wider reading.

Plans are coherent and logical but limited. Commentary offers limited critical insight into development undertaken and limited justification for the focus/skills area adopted. Tendency to a descriptive approach and lacking effective critical discussion of its feasibility and barriers and challenges in undertaking the action plan as outlined. Shows basic evidence that approach is informed by relevant literature and wider reading.

Plans are unclear/ poorly presented. Commentary is descriptive and offers little or no justification for the focus/skills area adopted and no critical discussion of its feasibility and barriers and challenges in undertaking the action plan as outlined. Little evidence that approach is informed by relevant literature and wider reading

Plan is absent, missing major elements or incoherent. Commentary is absent or unclear with no justification for the focus/skills areas consider and no critical discussion of its feasibility and barriers and challenges in undertaking the action plan as outlined. No evidence that approach is informed by relevant literature and wider reading

Continued overleaf…

 

MARKING CRITERIA

HRM7503-A

Outstanding/ Excellent

(70% or above)

Very Good

(69-60%)

 

Good

(59-50%)

Satisfactory

(49-40%)

Significant fail

(39-30%)

Substantial fail

(29% or under)

REFLECTIVE ACCOUNT (50%)

 

 

Detailed and insightful analysis showing in-depth understanding of and critical consideration of the module/MSc as a learning experience. Shows extensive evidence of self-awareness and perceptive insight into the module and broader and deeper learning. Use of extensive examples/ literature.

Coherent and showing understanding of and critical consideration of the module/MSc as a learning experience. Shows evidence of self-awareness and perceptive insight into the module and broader and deeper learning. Use of appropriate examples/ literature.

 

Reasonable understanding of and some critical consideration of the module/MSc as a learning experience. Shows some evidence of self-awareness and occasional insight into the module and broader and deeper learning. Some use of appropriate examples/ literature.

Some (limited) understanding of and partial critical consideration of the module/MSc as a learning experience. Tendency towards description rather than discussion. Limited evidence of self-awareness and insight into the module and broader and deeper learning. Little use of examples.

Shows little understanding and critical consideration of the module/MSc as a learning experience. Very descriptive. Little or no self-awareness or insight into the module and broader and deeper learning. Very little use of examples

 

Confused and showing no real understanding of or critical consideration of the module/MSc as a learning experience. No evidence of self-awareness or insight into the module and broader and deeper learning. Just a collection of points. No use of examples

 

 

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions