This assignment requires you to produce a brief E-Portfolio/initial career plan detailing how you will prepare for the graduate job market. You must: Choose a suitable graduate position from ‘Prospects’/DHLE.
2024-11-30 13:48:45
Faculty of Business and Law
Assignment Brief Mode E and R Regulations
Module Title:
|
Employment and Academic Skills
|
|
Assignment Number
|
Coursework 1 DEFERRAL
|
Module Code:
|
4001MKT
|
|
Assignment Title
|
Reflective Portfolio
|
Module Leader:
|
|
|
Assignment Credits
|
5 credits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Release Date:
|
|
|
|
|
Submission Date/Time:
|
04/07/2022 18:00
|
|
|
|
Submission
Time and Place:
|
Submission through Turnitin ONLY
|
|
|
|
Assessment Information
This assignment is an individual assignment.
This assignment requires you to:
One of the main aims of attending University is to be successful in future employment. This assignment requires you to produce a brief E-Portfolio/initial career plan detailing how you will prepare for the graduate job market.
You must:
- Choose a suitable graduate position from ‘Prospects’/DHLE.
- Understand the requirements of this graduate position.
- Produce an action plan (your initial career plan) outlining how you will improve your ability in the required skills for the chosen position, with timescales and measures for improvements.
- Reflect on your current ability for each of the required skills, such as communication skills, teamwork skills and time management skills.
Your E-Portfolio/career plan will include –
The initial job search spreadsheet on Excel (or equivalent)
The job description and personal specification for the Graduate position (downloaded)
Your action plan i.e. your career plan
Your reflections on your ability of the job-related skills (only part included in the 1000 word count
Remember that your academic writing skills will also be assessed in this coursework.
Criteria for Assessment
Work will be assessed using the grading rubric below
4001MKT Academic and Employment Skills 2021-22, CW 1 Assessment Criteria and Grading
|
Grade Boundary
|
Assessment Element
|
0-19%
|
20-39%
|
40-49%
|
50-59%
|
60-69%
|
70-79%
|
80% +
|
Job related research (K and U) 30%
Evidence of job search; a relevant position chosen; knowledge and understanding of its requirements shown and all parts included.
|
Extremely weak evidence of job-related research. Irrelevant position chosen. Weak K and U of requirements.
Limited parts of portfolio included.
|
Poor evidence of job-related research. Irrelevant position chosen. Poor K and U of requirements.
Some parts of portfolio included.
|
Acceptable evidence of job-related research. Relevant position chosen. Adequate K and U of requirements.
Most parts of portfolio included.
|
Good evidence of job-related research. Relevant position chosen. Good K and U of requirements.
All parts of portfolio included.
|
Very good evidence of job-related research. Relevant position chosen. Very good K and U of requirements.
All parts of portfolio included.
|
Excellent evidence of job-related research. Relevant position chosen. Excellent K and U of requirements.
All parts of portfolio included.
|
Outstanding evidence of job-related research. Highly relevant position chosen. Clear K and U of requirements.
All parts of portfolio included.
|
Quality of Reflection (Application) 30%
Application of reflection using Gibbs Reflective Cycle
|
Extremely weak application of reflective theories to relevant job-related skills. Reflection is incomplete.
|
Poor application of reflective theories to relevant job-related skills. Reflection is incomplete.
|
Adequate application of reflective theories to relevant job-related skills. Reflection is mostly complete.
|
Good application of reflective theories to relevant job-related skills. Reflection is complete.
|
Very good application of reflective theories to relevant job-related skills. Reflection is complete.
|
Excellent application of reflective theories to relevant job-related skills. Reflection is holistic and complete.
|
Outstanding application of reflective theories to highly relevant job-related skills. Reflection is thorough and complete.
|
Structure of work 30%
Portfolio/Action Plan
|
No structure of portfolio, content is not organised, no front page/contents page included. Weak/no career plan.
|
Poor structure of portfolio, includes front page and/or contents page. Poor presentation of career plan with some timescales.
|
Acceptable structure of portfolio, includes front page and contents page. Adequate presentation of career plan with timescales.
|
Good structure of portfolio, includes front page and contents page. Good presentation of career plan with timescales.
|
Very good structure of portfolio, includes front page and contents page. Very good presentation of career plan with timescales.
|
Excellent structure of portfolio, includes front page and contents page. Clear presentation of career plan with timescales.
|
Outstanding structure of portfolio, includes front page and contents page. Professional presentation of career plan with timescales.
|
Presentation 10%
Content of work
|
Extremely weak spelling, punctuation, grammar, referencing style; writing style not academic or professional
|
Poor spelling, punctuation, grammar, APA Referencing style; writing style is not academic/professional
|
Acceptable spelling, punctuation, grammar, mostly accurate APA Referencing; writing style could be more professional
|
Good spelling, punctuation, grammar, accurate APA Referencing and professional writing style
|
Very good spelling, punctuation, grammar, accurate CU APA Referencing style; writing style academic/professional
|
Excellent spelling, punctuation, grammar, accurate CU APA Referencing style; writing style is academic/professional
|
Outstanding spelling, punctuation, grammar, accurate APA Referencing style, writing style academic/professional
|
This assignment is designed to assess learning outcomes:
1. Recognise and identify their own personal and employability skills and how to improve them.
2. Understand the graduate labour market.
3. Present an initial plan for future career.
Word Count
The word count is 1000 words (reflection only)
There will be a penalty of a deduction of 10% of the mark (after internal moderation) for work exceeding the word limit by 10% or more.
The word limit includes quotations and citations, but excludes the references list.
How to submit your assessment
The assessment must be submitted by 18:00 on 04/07/2022. No paper copies are required. You can access the submission link through the module web.
- Your coursework will be given a zero mark if you do not submit a copy through Turnitin. Please take care to ensure that you have fully submitted your work.
- Please ensure that you have submitted your work using the correct file format, unreadable files will receive a mark of zero. The Faculty accepts Microsoft Office and PDF documents, unless otherwise advised by the module leader.
- All work submitted after the submission deadline without a valid and approved reason (see below) will be given a mark of zero.
- The University wants you to do your best. However we know that sometimes events happen which mean that you can’t submit your coursework by the deadline – these events should be beyond your control and not easy to predict. If this happens, you can apply for an extension to your deadline for up to five days, or if you need longer, you can apply for a deferral, which takes you to the next assessment period (for example, to the resit period following the main Assessment Boards). You must apply before the deadline.
You will find information about the process and what is or is not considered to be an event beyond your control at https://share.coventry.ac.uk/students/Registry/Pages/Deferrals-and-Extension.aspx
- Students MUST keep a copy and/or an electronic file of their assignment.
- Checks will be made on your work using anti-plagiarism software and approved plagiarism checking websites.
GUIDELINES AND BACKGROUND TO THIS ASSIGNMENT
Plagiarism
As part of your study you will be involved in carrying out research and using this when writing up your coursework. It is important that you correctly acknowledge someone else’s writing, thoughts or ideas and that you do not attempt to pass this off as your own work. Doing so is known as plagiarism. It is not acceptable to copy from another source without acknowledging that it is someone else’s writing or thinking. This includes using paraphrasing as well as direct quotations. You are expected to correctly cite and reference the works of others. The Centre for Academic Writing provides documents to help you get this right. If you are unsure, please visit www.coventry.ac.uk/caw. You can also check your understanding of academic conduct by completing the Good Academic Practice quiz.
Self-plagiarism or reuse of work previously submitted
You must not submit work for assessment that you have already submitted (partially or in full), either for your current course or for another qualification of this and any other university, unless this is specifically provided for in your assignment brief or specific course or module information. Where earlier work by you is citable, ie. it has already been published/submitted, you must reference it clearly. Identical pieces of work submitted concurrently will also be considered to be self-plagiarism. Self-plagiarism is unacceptable because you cannot gain credit for the same work twice.
The University VLE includes a plagiarism detection system and assessors are experienced enough to recognise plagiarism when it occurs. Copying another student’s work, using previous work of your own or copying large sections from a book or the internet are examples of plagiarism and carry serious consequences. If you are a business student and joined Coventry University in September 2020 or later please use APA 7th edition referencing, if you joined prior to this date you may use APA or the existing Harvard Reference Style (Coventry version) that you are familiar with. Law students should use OSCOLA. Please be consistent in the referencing style that you use and use it correctly to avoid a case of plagiarism or cheating being brought. If you are unsure, please contact the Centre for Academic Writing, your Progress Coach or a member of the course team.
Return of Marked Work
You can expect to have marked work returned to you TBC. If for any reason there is a delay you will be kept informed. Marks and feedback will be provided online/in class/face to face. As always, marks will have been internally moderated only, and will therefore be provisional; your mark will be formally agreed later in the year once the external examiner has completed his / her review.
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions