The dissertation is the final stage of the Master’s degree and provides you with the opportunity to show that you have gained the necessary skills and knowledge in order to organise and conduct a research project

                                            IMA7006 Dissertation Assessment Brief

Assessment Title

Dissertation

Assessment Type (Weighting)

14000 - 15000 words Report, 100%

Submission Deadline

12th September 2025 via Turnitin 23:59hrs 

Learning Outcomes

LO1

Demonstrate a masterly grasp of the topic area researched

LO2

Demonstrate skills of analysis, evaluation, critical reflection, synthesis and conceptualisation

LO3

Critically assess the results of the research against the objectives

AI STATUS: CATEGORY A: NO GAI TOOL IS PERMITTED

Brief

The dissertation is the final stage of the Master’s degree and provides you with the opportunity to show that you have gained the necessary skills and knowledge in order to organise and conduct a research project. It should demonstrate that you are skilled in identifying an area, or areas, suitable for research: setting research objectives; locating, organising and critically analysing the relevant secondary data and authoritative literature; devising an appropriate research methodology; analysing the primary data selected and drawing on the literature in the field; drawing conclusions; and if appropriate making relevant recommendations and indications of areas for further research. 

A dissertation is a ‘formal’ document and there are ‘rules’ that govern the way in which it is presented. It must have chapters that provide an introduction, a literature review, a justification of the data selected for analysis and research methodology, analysis of the data and, finally, conclusions and recommendations. Where the subject is based around a business or an applied situation recommendations for action may also be required. 

Though you continue your research area/topic from semester 2. It is expected that you streamline and update your Chapter 1 – introduction, Chapter 2 – literature review and Chapter 3 – Research Methodology. You will improve the initial three chapters and in conjunction with your supervisor’s guidance, you will then undertake the data gathering by combination of both fieldwork and desk research, evaluate and synthesise the findings and present them clearly. You will also present a set of conclusions drawn from the findings. In the end you will reflect on your overall journey as a researcher (personal reflection).

Dissertations follow a standard format; an indication of the main structure and contents is given below:

Title Page

Abstract

Acknowledgements

Table of Contents

Glossary

List of Tables

List of Figures 

  1. Introduction
  • The context in which the research takes place.
  • Presentation of the problem that you have identified.
  • Rationale for conducting the research, who could benefit from it and how.
  • A clear and succinct statement of the research aims and objectives that the dissertation is going to address.
  • Key research questions
  • The way the dissertation is to be organised.
  1. Literature Review
  • Critical review of key areas of literature
  • Development of a conceptual framework
  • Gap in the literature
  1. Methodology
  • Research paradigm, approach and design
  • Methods used and rationale for these.
  • Participants and Sampling (for quantitative research)
  • Participants and criteria for selecting the participants (for qualitative research)
  • Presentation of the instruments for data collection
  • Data analysis
  • Ethical considerations – (what ethical issues you have identified and what you did to address them)
  • Validity and reliability (for quantitative research)
  • Credibility and reflexive analysis – (for qualitative research) 
  1. Findings and Analysis
  • Summary and analyses of data (graphs, charts, results of statistical analysis)
  • Interpretation, synthesis and discussion
  1. Conclusion
  • Summary of dissertation with particular focus on answers to research objectives
  • Summary of contributions
  • Limitations and future direction of the research
  •  
  1. Personal Reflection
  • Personal development
  • Personal experience of the research or enquiry process 
  • References
  • Appendices
    • Appendices may be used to provide relevant supporting evidence for reference
    •  Students may wish to include in appendices, evidence which confirms the originality of their work or illustrates points of principle set out in the main text, questionnaires, and interview guidelines. Some of the following could be used too for the appendix section:
    • Table of results for quantitative research
    • Transcripts of interviews, interview notes for qualitative research.
    • Ethics checklist accompanied by the relevant supporting documents such as participant information sheet, participant consent form and other relevant evidence.
    • Reflective career skill development summary
    • Supervisor meeting notes
    • A blank questionnaire (if used) 

Additional elements, such as a glossary, may also be included.

Guidance on formatting and presentation requirements, including font sizes, line spacing, etc., will be available on Moodle; and useful resource is available on LEAP: https://www.bolton.ac.uk/leaponline/My-Academic-Development/My-Assessments/Writing-a-Dissertation.aspx.

Marking Scheme 

 

 

70%+

60-69%

50-59%

40-49%

0-39%

Introduction

10%

Feasible and clear research objectives.

Nature of context is outlined with exceptional clarity

Feasible and clear research objectives.

Nature of context is clearly defined.

Feasible and clear objectives and research question.

Nature of context needs improvement

Poorly phrased objectives or research question.

Under developed research context.

Unfeasible objectives; poorly phrased or omitted research question. Little

explanation of the nature of the research or its context.

Literature Review & Conceptual Framework 20%

All work incorporated is recent and/or relevant and is correctly interpreted. Critique is exceptional and clearly informs the synthesis of materials to form the C/F. Very strong supporting references.

Almost all work incorporated is recent and/or relevant, relevant and the majority is correctly interpreted. Very clear synthesis to produce valid C/F. Strong supporting references.

Includes relevant and recent critically evaluated material clearly synthesised into the C/F. Good supporting references.

Includes some relevant and recent theory, but without critical interpretation. C/F is unfeasible or under developed.

Weak referencing.

Insufficient theoretical content. C/F omitted.

Poor referencing.

Research Methods/ Approach

20%

Exceptionally clear justification of philosophy and strategy.

Robust application of methods to generate abundant relevant data that are rigorously evaluated.

 

 

 

Very clear justification of research philosophy and strategy. Triangulation is clearly incorporated. Robust/ critical evaluation of methods.

Philosophy is understood and the choice is clearly justified. Strategy is appropriate. Triangulation is clearly incorporated into the research design with sample details. Methods are critiqued.

Research philosophy, strategy, methods, validity and triangulation is understood but weakly developed.

Sample details (where appropriate) are missing. Weak evaluation of methods

Weak understanding of research philosophy, strategy, methods, validity and triangulation. Sample details (where appropriate) are missing. Weak evaluation of methods.

Findings & Analysis

25%

Exceptionally complete data are clearly rigorously/critically interrogated by the conceptual frame. Very well presented. Results are clearly triangulated and exceptionally well presented.

 

Data address the objectives and have a strong connection to the conceptual frame. Data are critically evaluated, triangulated and very well presented.

Data address the objectives but lack a strong connection to the conceptual frame. Some critical interpretation of data. Presentation of data weak in places.

Data only partially address the objectives. Weak incorporation of concepts and theory.  Partial or lack of triangulation. No critical evaluation of data. Unclear presentation.

Data presented do not address the objectives with rigour.

Weak incorporation of concepts and theory. Partial or lack of triangulation. No critical evaluation of data. Presentation is poor.

Conclusions and/or Recommendations/

Implementation Plan

15%

Exceptional in their clarity and support from the evidence.

Rigorous consideration of areas for further research. Recommendations very clearly relate to the conclusions

Very clearly stated and emergent from the evidence presented. Areas for further research are also clearly indicated. Recommendations clearly relate to the conclusions

Clearly stated and emergent from the evidence presented. Some consideration of areas for further research.

Recommendations relate to the conclusions

Weak and superficial conclusion and/or recommendations or implementation plan

Poor/underdeveloped  conclusion and/or recommendations or implementation plan

Personal Reflection

10%

Exceptional in critically reflecting one’s personal development during the professional project and experience of the research or enquiry process

Very clear critical reflection of one’s personal development during the professional project and experience of the research or enquiry process

Clear in critically reflecting one’s personal development during the professional project and experience of the research or enquiry process

Includes some weak and superficial critical reflection of one’s personal development during the professional project and experience of the research or enquiry process

Poor/underdeveloped   reflection of one’s personal development during the professional project and experience of the research or enquiry process 

 

 

 

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions