LO1 Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of anatomy and physiology that underpins the clinical assessment of their client group
2025-01-09 10:00:58
Assessment Information/Brief 2022/2023
Module title
|
Clinical Decision-Making Reasoning and Judgement (CDMRJ)
|
CRN
|
33267 & 41316
|
Level
|
6
|
Assessment title
|
Client-focused Case Study
|
Weighting within module
|
This assessment is worth 100% of the module mark.
|
Submission deadline date and time
|
Tuesday 16th May 2023 16:00hrs
|
|
How to submit
You should submit your report via Turnitin in a Word file.
When you submit your case study please enter your student roll number e.g. @00123456 as the title of the file.
You will access Turnitin from the CDMRJ Blackboard site. Find out how to submit your assignment via Turnitin here: https://www.salford.ac.uk/skills- for-learning/home/esubmission
|
Your Case Study should follow the following structure:
- Introduction
Identify a patient/client in whose care you have been involved including a brief overview of the patient/client’s health problem, initial presentation and subsequent significant change or deterioration in health status.
Explain the scope of the case study and include a confidentiality statement to indicate that any patient details have been anonymised (in observation of GPDR and NMC requirements).
- Main Body
Develop the case study by critically discussing the patient’s alteration in health status, analysing patient data systematically and comparing interventions, taking current evidence-based practice into consideration. This should include evaluation and interpretation of observational and investigative data used to inform your plan of action and clinical decision- making, reasoning and judgement based on patient changes, the situation and the working environment.
Critically discuss your decision-making and justify your actions with supportive evidence.
Discuss any continuing care needs including liaison with the MDT if relevant. Include a short paragraph evaluating the outcomes of the decisions that were taken, reflecting on your clinical decision-making strategies, reasoning and judgement in order to enhance your practice delivery in the future.
3. Conclusion
Briefly summarise what has already gone before and reiterate key points on how the processes of clinical decision making, reasoning and judgement, in the case study, were supported by objective evidence.
4. Reference list
All references cited in the assignment must appear in the reference list and cited as per University guidelines. (NB the reference list is not included in the word count).
Assignment formatting guidelines:
Your student roll number should be the title of the Word file. Do not insert your name anywhere in your assignment or on Turnitin.
Type your essay in Microsoft Sans Serif or Verdana font, size 12 or larger and fully justify your formatted text. Number all pages.
Use 1.5 line spacing in the main body of your assignment and single line spacing in your reference list at the end of your assignment.
Provide a final word count (not including your reference list) at the end of your assignment.
Your ‘in-text’ citations and final reference list should be written in APA 6th (Harvard) style. Please use the University of Salford’s referencing handbook to avoid errors in referencing http://www.salford.ac.uk/skills-for- learning/home/using-and-referencing-information/referencing
|
Assessed intended learning outcomes
On successful completion of this assessment, you will be able to:
Knowledge and Understanding
- Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of anatomy and physiology that underpins the clinical assessment of their client group
- Detect and recognise deviations from the normal and understand their clinical significance
- Critically analyse and interpret findings from a range of client information
Practical, Professional or Subject Specific Skills
- Critically analyse and interpret findings from a range of client information
- Independently conduct health needs assessment for clients, within their specific clinical setting, with reference to universally accepted standards
- Demonstrate clinical decision-making reasoning judgement and formulate a plan of action based on the findings of the health needs assessment
- Display awareness of how effective interaction with the multi- disciplinary team can positively influence client care
- Exercise clinical judgement, formulate an action plan based on the findings of the health needs assessment to:
(a) independently conduct health needs assessment for patients/clients within their specific clinical setting, with reference to universally accepted standards
|
(b) display awareness of how effective interaction with the multi-disciplinary team can positively influence client care
(c) critically discuss concepts of integrated care pathways, evidence-based practice, clinical effectiveness and clinical governance in relation to effectively responding to the health needs of their specific client group.
Patient confidentiality:
The University guidelines for assignment submission are clear on the issue of protecting patient confidentiality and this is a reminder to ensure that under no circumstances do you allow identification of a patient in your submitted work.
Please be mindful that this includes the following:
- Clinical documentation where the patient’s ID, name, address, etc is clearly visible or can be identified
- Diagnostic information that has identifiable patient data visible
In the case of students who do not take the utmost care to protect patient confidentiality the submitted assignment may be classed as a referral.
Transferable Skills and other Attributes Communication
Accurate interpretation and dissemination of relevant verbal and written information to individuals
Numerical Skills
Accurately interpret and convey numerical data
IT Skills
Uses technology to collect and interpret data. Locate and utilize health care databases Working with Others
Demonstrate team-working skills
Managing Own Learning
Identify learning needs through reflection on practice Engage in self-directed learning activities
Develop awareness of Personal Development Plans
Problem Solving
Use a problem-solving framework to guide decision-making
|
Word count
Your client focussed case study should be no more than 3,500 words. The final reference list does not form part of the word count, but your ‘in-text’ citations do form part of the word count
Penalties for exceeding the word count
You must get as close to the word limit as possible. In accordance with the University’s Assessment and Feedback policy, ff your work is over the specified 3,500 words the surplus (those words in excess of the first 3,500) will not be considered when assigning your final grade.
|
Feedback arrangements
Please access the ‘My Grades’ tab in the Module BB site
You can expect to receive feedback and interim marks for your summative Client Focussed Case Study on: 07/06/2022
|
Assignment Support arrangements
There are two timetabled three-hour Lecturer facilitated group supervision sessions within the module. During these sessions you will be expected to present and discuss your case study with your peer group and academic staff who will provide you with constructive feedback.
Group Assignment Supervision 1
Please come to this session with a plan of your assignment and be prepared to present and discuss the plan with your peers and lecturer
You would have identified the patient/client, can explain the background, the relevant health issue as you intend in the assignment introduction.
Group Assignment Supervision 2
In this session you will be expected to present and discuss your case study which should now be well developed though not yet complete. For example, you should be able to discuss some of the clinical decisions and judgements that were made and the reasoning behind them.
Both sessions will be facilitated by Lecturers and additional information is located on the module Blackboard site.
AskUS
The University offers a range of support services for students through askUS.
Good Academic Conduct and Academic Misconduct
Students are expected to learn and demonstrate skills associated with good academic conduct (academic integrity). Good academic conduct includes the use of clear and correct referencing of source materials. Here is a link to where you can find out more about the skills which students require http://www.salford.ac.uk/skills-for-learning.
Academic Misconduct is an action which may give you an unfair advantage in your academic work. This includes plagiarism, asking someone else to write your assessment for you or taking notes into an exam. The University takes all forms of academic misconduct seriously. You can find out how to avoid academic misconduct here https://www.salford.ac.uk/skills-for-learning.
Assessment Information
If you have any questions about assessment rules, you can find out more here.
|
Personal Mitigating Circumstances
If personal mitigating circumstances may have affected your ability to complete this assessment, you can find more information about personal mitigating circumstances procedure here.
Programme Leader/Student Progression Administrator
If you have any concerns about your studies, contact your Programme Leader (Helen Franks) or your Student Progression Administrator. All contact details can be found on the BSc (Hon’s) Nursing Programme BB site.
|
Assessment Criteria
Marks for your assignment will be allocated based on Level 6 Grade Descriptors. There are five grade descriptors that contribute to your overall final mark:
- Knowledge, understanding, application
- Academic writing
- Structure
- Evidence
- Referencing
You should consult the Clinical Decision-Making Reasoning and Judgement Blackboard Module site for additional information on grade descriptors.
|
In Year Retrieval Scheme
Your assessment is not eligible for in year retrieval
|
Reassessment
If you fail your assessment, and are eligible for reassessment, you will need to resubmit on or before 4:00pm: 16/05/2022 Feedback: 17/06/2023
For students with accepted personal mitigating circumstances, this will be your replacement assessment attempt. Students should be aware that there is no late submission period at reassessment (this includes students who have accepted PMCs from a previous attempt).
The reassessment assessment is the same as the original summative assessment task
|