This individual report requires you to use the “CW2_Superstore_data.csv” dataset. Individual report that answers the following tasks up to the specified word count limit. Business Statistics 7034SSL
2025-04-14 13:20:18
Student Assignment Brief
This document is intended for Coventry University Group students for their own use in completing their assessed work for this module. It must not be passed to third parties or posted on any website. If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact your Module Leader.
Contents:
The work you submit for this assignment must be your own independent work, or in the case of a group assignment your own groups’ work. More information is available in the ‘Assignment Task’ section of this assignment brief.
Assignment Information
Module Name: Business Statistics
Module Code: 7034SSL
Assignment Title: Individual Report
Assignment Due: 18:00 UK time
Assignment Credit: 10 credits
Word Count (or equivalent): 2000 words +/- 10%
Assignment Type: Normal CW2
Percentage Grade (Applied Core Assessment). You will be provided with an overall grade between 0% and 100%. You have one opportunity to pass the assignment at or above 40%.
Assignment Task
This individual report requires you to use the “CW2_Superstore_data.csv” dataset.
Individual report that answers the following tasks up to the specified word count limit. In this report, you are required to answer Task 1 to 4 that will start with a Literature Review along with descriptive analysis followed by hypothesis testing, application of testing techniques & its presentation along with a brief conclusion on selected hypothesis.
1.LITERATURE REVIEW
You have been asked to read relevant literature individually and write a review about statistical analysis in published articles on superstores. Your review must be critically discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the statistical approaches and their practical implications to improve the industry/service. You are recommended to review at least five distinct peer-reviewed academic publications published in the last five years (between 2020 and 2024). This literature review will serve you to understand the applicability of business statistics in a particular domain with published research.
For example:
First made a search criterion and identify the potentially relevant literature. You have selected an article based on your search criteria. Now, read the article and write like this
- Summarise the article in which you need to discuss how this article examines the use of regression models to predict retail sales based on historical sales data and external factors like holidays and promotions.
- Strengths: Regression models provide clear interpretability and are effective for short-term forecasts.
- Weaknesses: They struggle with capturing non-linear relationships and are sensitive to outliers.
- Practical Implications: Retailers can use regression models to optimise inventory planning but must combine them with robust outlier detection techniques.
2.DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS
Find descriptive statistical measurements and interpret them in a business context. In your interpretation, please assume that you are describing a dataset to a team of professional colleagues who are non-specialists in statistics subject. Data cleaning is an inclusive step.
For example: You have a raw dataset which may have potential issues, now do the following steps
- Clean the Dataset: Remove irrelevant rows, fix column headers, and format numerical data for analysis.
- Calculate Descriptive Statistics: Compute measures such as mean, median, standard deviation, and range for relevant variables (e.g., "Price per Unit," "Units Sold," "Total Sales").
- Interpretation for Non-Specialists: Present the findings in simple language, focusing on business insights.
- Summarise the key aspects in your own words.
3. HYPOTHESIS TESTING & RESULTS
Develop Hypothesis/s and critically apply hypothesis testing to examine your cleaned dataset. You can develop hypotheses from your preliminary analysis, wider research and thinking and test these using the data set given above by the statistical techniques listed below at a significance level of 5%.
- Chi Square Test (X²): Examine relationships between variables to identify potential associations.
- One-Way ANOVA (including post hoc analysis): Compare means across multiple groups to determine significant differences while identifying specific group variations through post hoc analysis.
- c. Multiple Linear Regression (including multicollinearity and VIF analysis): Explore relationships between dependent and independent variables, ensuring the validity of the model by addressing multicollinearity using Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) analysis
For example: Now, suppose you have a cleaned dataset, now do the following steps
- Develop hypotheses based on preliminary analysis and broader research insights.
- Clean and preprocess the dataset to prepare for statistical analysis.
- Use Chi-Square Test (X²) to identify relationships between categorical variables and assess potential associations.
- Apply One-Way ANOVA to compare group means and determine significant differences across multiple categories. Conduct post hoc analysis to pinpoint specific group variations.
- Implement Multiple Linear Regression to examine relationships between dependent and independent variables.
- Perform multicollinearity analysis using Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) to ensure the regression model’s validity.
- Test all hypotheses at a 5% significance level and report results with statistical metrics (e.g., p- values, confidence intervals).
- Interpret findings critically, highlighting patterns, trends, or significant outcomes relevant to the hypothesis.
4.HYPOTHESIS SUITABILITY & CONCLUSION
Clearly explain why the proposed hypotheses are well-suited for testing using the chosen statistical techniques. Highlight how the techniques align with the type of data. Conclude by summarizing the results and stating your decision regarding the hypotheses, whether they are accepted or rejected,
based on the analysis conducted. Ensure the conclusion is supported by the statistical findings and provide suggestions/advices to the business based on this statistical analysis.
For example: You have made an analysis, now what you need to do is to
- Justify the suitability of each hypothesis for testing with the selected statistical techniques.
- Explain how the techniques align with the data type (e.g., categorical for Chi-Square, numerical for ANOVA and regression).
- Summarize statistical findings clearly, including key metrics such as p-values and confidence intervals.
- State the decision for each hypothesis (accepted or rejected) based on the analysis.
- Provide actionable business insights derived from the results (e.g., improving inventory management, targeted marketing).
- Offer suggestions for implementing findings to address identified trends or issues effectively.
- Conclude with a concise summary of the statistical analysis outcomes and their practical implications for the business.
Assignment Guidelines: It is recommended to use Locate or EBSCOhost for your peer reviewed publications literature review. Citations must be in APA format with references listed at the end of the report. It is not advised to use citations other than task (1, and 4). In this individual report, you can use Excel, IBM SPSS, Python, R, Power BI and/or Tableau. Copying code from LLM model is not recommended for tasks. Add graphs with captions where necessary.
Dataset Description: Description of data is as:
- Response (target) - 1 if customer accepted the offer in the last campaign, 0 otherwise
- ID - Unique ID of each customer
- YearBirth - Age of the customer Complain - 1 if the customer complained in the last 2 years DtCustomer - date of customer`s enrollment with the company
- Education - customer`s level of education
- Marital - customer`s marital status
- Kidhome - number of small children in customer`s household
- Teenhome - number of teenagers in customer`s household
- Income - customer`s yearly household income
- MntFishProducts - the amount spent on fish products in the last 2 years
- MntMeatProducts - the amount spent on meat products in the last 2 years
- MntFruits - the amount spent on fruits products in the last 2 years
- MntSweetProducts - amount spent on sweet products in the last 2 years
- MntWines - the amount spent on wine products in the last 2 years
- MntGoldProds - the amount spent on gold products in the last 2 years
- NumDealsPurchases - number of purchases made with discount
- NumCatalogPurchases - number of purchases made using catalog (buying goods to be shipped through the mail)
- NumStorePurchases - number of purchases made directly in stores
- NumWebPurchases - number of purchases made through the company`s website
- NumWebVisitsMonth - number of visits to company`s website in the last month
- Recency - number of days since the last purchase
Submission Instructions:
The assessment must be submitted by 18:00 on 10/04/2025. No paper copies are required. Your assignment must be in Microsoft Words format only, NOT in PDF. Avoid uploading from google drive directly as it may convert your assignment into PDF automatically. You can access the submission link through the Aula page – Assignments section.
- Your coursework will be given a zero mark if you do not submit a copy through Turnitin within the assigned time. Please ensure that you have submitted your work properly well before the deadlines. In case of any issue, inform the tutor or the Module Leader well before time via email.
- Please ensure you submitted your work using the correct file format, unreadable files will receive a mark of zero.
- All work submitted after the submission deadline without a valid and approved reason (see below) will be given a mark of zero.
- The University wants you to do your best. However, we know that sometimes events happen which mean that you can’t submit your coursework by the deadline – these events should be beyond your control and not easy to predict. If this happens, you can apply for an extension to your deadline for up to 5 working days, or if you need longer, you can apply for a deferral, which takes you to the next assessment period (for example, to the Resit period following the main Assessment Boards). You must apply before the deadline. You will find information about the process and what is or is not considered to be an event beyond your control at Extenuating Circumstances.
- Students MUST keep a copy and/or an electronic file of their assignment.
- Checks will be made on your work using anti-plagiarism software and approved plagiarism checking websites.
- The word count is 2000 words +/- 10%. The word limit includes quotations and citations but excludes the references list.
- There will be a penalty of a deduction of 10% of the mark (after internal moderation) for work exceeding the word limit by 10% or more.
Marking and Feedback
How will my assignment be marked?
Your assignment will be marked by the module team.
How will I receive my grades and feedback?
Provisional marks will be released once internally moderated.
Feedback will be provided by the module team alongside grades release.
You will be able to access your feedback via the same Turnitin submission link you submitted your work to.
Your provisional marks and feedback should be available within 10 working days.
What will I be marked against?
Marks distribution as:
Assessment Component
|
Criteria
|
Marks Distribution
|
1. Literature Review
|
Critically discuss statistical methods in superstore studies based on at least five peer-reviewed publications, summarising articles with strengths, weaknesses, and practical implications.
|
20 marks
|
2. Descriptive Statistics
|
Clean the dataset, compute descriptive statistics (e.g., mean, median, standard deviation), and interpret results in a business context for a non-specialist audience.
|
20 marks
|
3. Hypothesis Testing & Results
|
Develop and test hypotheses using statistical techniques (Chi-Square, ANOVA, Regression) at a 5% significance level, including multicollinearity analysis and critical interpretation of findings.
|
40 marks
|
4. Hypothesis Suitability & Conclusion
|
Justify hypotheses` suitability, summarise findings, make decisions on hypotheses, and provide actionable business recommendations based on statistical analysis.
|
20 marks
|
Total
|
|
100 marks
|
Details of the specific CW marking criteria for these tasks can be as
Assessment Component
|
Criteria
|
Excellent (80-
100%)
|
Good (60-79%)
|
Satisfactory (40-59%)
|
Poor (<40%)
|
1. Literature Review
|
Critically discuss statistical methods in superstore studies, summarising articles with strengths, weaknesses, and
implications.
|
Comprehensiv e review with thorough critique, clear relevance to the topic, and insightful implications
for practice.
|
Well-detailed review with good critique and relevant implications for practice, though less insightful.
|
Basic review with limited critique and generic implications for practice; relevance partially
demonstrated.
|
Minimal review with weak critique, little relevance to the topic, and no clear implications for practice.
|
2. Descriptive Statistics
|
Clean data, compute descriptive statistics, and interpret findings in a business context.
|
Exceptionally clean dataset, accurate statistics, and clear, insightful interpretations suitable for non-
specialists.
|
Clean dataset, mostly accurate statistics, and clear interpretations but lacking depth or precision.
|
Basic data cleaning and statistics with partial accuracy; interpretations are overly general or unclear.
|
Poor data cleaning and inaccurate statistics; interpretations lack clarity or fail to relate to the business context.
|
3. Hypothesis Testing & Results
|
Develop and test hypotheses using statistical techniques (Chi- Square, ANOVA, Regression) and interpret findings critically.
|
Well-justified hypotheses, rigorous statistical application, accurate results, and insightful critical interpretation.
|
Clear hypotheses and appropriate statistical techniques with minor errors or lack of depth in interpretation.
|
Hypotheses are underdeveloped, statistical techniques applied with notable errors, and limited interpretation.
|
Weak or missing hypotheses, inappropriate or poorly executed statistical techniques, and no meaningful interpretation.
|
4. Hypothesis Suitability & Conclusion
|
Justify hypotheses, summarise findings, and provide actionable recommendations.
|
Strong justification, concise and accurate summary, and highly relevant and actionable recommendati ons.
|
Adequate justification, accurate summary, and mostly relevant recommendatio ns with some lack of depth.
|
Limited justification, partially accurate summary, and generic or less relevant recommendation s.
|
Weak justification, unclear or inaccurate summary, and no actionable recommendations
.
|
Generalised details of the marking criteria for this task can be found at the bottom of this assignment brief.
Assessed Module Learning Outcomes
The Learning Outcomes for this module align to the marking criteria which can be found at the end of this brief. Ensure you understand the marking criteria to ensure successful achievement of the assessment task. The following module learning outcomes are assessed in this task:
Learning Outcomes:
On completion of this module students will be able to:
- Critically discuss the strengths and weaknesses of a particular statistical approach and the practical implications of a statistical analysis.
- Evaluate and critically apply appropriate statistical analysis, with the aid of computer packages, to business and management data for business decision-making.
- Interpret and professionally communicate statistical analysis findings to non-specialists within a business.
- Make critical judgements on business cases and provide suggestions and advice to the business based on their statistical analysis & finding
Assignment Support and Academic Integrity
If you have any questions about this assignment, please see the Student Guidance on Coursework for more information.
Spelling, Punctuation, and Grammar:
You are expected to use effective, accurate, and appropriate language within this assessment task.
Academic Integrity:
The work you submit must be your own, or in the case of groupwork, that of your group. All sources of information need to be acknowledged and attributed; therefore, you must provide references for all sources of information and acknowledge any tools used in the production of your work, including Artificial Intelligence (AI). We use detection software and make routine checks for evidence of academic misconduct. For AI related usage, please refer to the University guidelines
It is your responsibility to keep a record of how your thinking has developed as you progress through to submission. Appropriate evidence could include: version controlled documents, developmental sketchbooks, or journals. This evidence can be called upon if we suspect academic misconduct. If using Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the development of your assignment, you must reference which tools you have used and for what purposes you have used them. This information must be acknowledged in your final submission.
Definitions of academic misconduct, including plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and collusion can be found on the Student Portal. All cases of suspected academic misconduct are referred for investigation, the outcomes of which can have profound consequences to your studies. For more information on academic integrity please visit the Academic and Research Integrity section of the Student Portal.
Support for Students with Disabilities or Additional Needs:
If you have a disability, long-term health condition, specific learning difference, mental health diagnosis or symptoms and have discussed your support needs with health and wellbeing you may be able to access support that will help with your studies.
If you feel you may benefit from additional support, but have not disclosed a disability to the University, or have disclosed but are yet to discuss your support needs it is important to let us know so we can provide the right support for your circumstances. Visit the Student Portal to find out more.
Unable to Submit on Time?
The University wants you to do your best. However, we know that sometimes events happen which mean that you cannot submit your assessment by the deadline or sit a scheduled exam. If you think this might be the case, guidance on understanding what counts as an extenuating circumstance, and how to apply is available on the Student Portal.
This document is intended for Coventry University Group students for their own use in completing
Administration of Assessment
Module Leader Name:
Module Leader Email:
This document is intended for Coventry University Group students for their own use in completing
Page 10 of 14
Assessment Marking Criteria
Guidance for Course Teams: Assessment criteria should align to the University-level assessment criteria for the relevant level of study. These are available through the Academic Enhancement and Professional Development website. Training on assessment and feedback approaches is available through the Course Booking System.
(Delete if not applicable or replace with different marking criteria)
Important: If the assessment used is a Core (Pass/Fail) assessment then please amend the marking criteria accordingly. Guidance on the use of Core Assessment is available on the Office of Teaching and Learning SharePoint site.
Criterion
|
Theory, concepts and models
(30%)
|
Analysis, evaluation and application
(40%)
|
Critique, conclusions and recommendations
(30%)
|
Exceptional First
80 to 100%
|
Evidence of exceptional research well beyond the minimum recommended using a range of methodologies.
Exceptional understanding of knowledge and subject specific theories and concepts with evidence of originality and autonomy.
Arguments are exceptional, nuanced and well supported by a variety of literature.
|
Exceptional analytical skills. Insightful and perceptive analysis that demonstrates both the depth and breadth of the issues with excellent examples.
Exceptional integration of theory into practice such that new contributions to knowledge are emergent.
Well-developed problem-solving skills with an exceptional ability to apply learning resources.
Demonstrates creativity and a high degree of originality and autonomy.
|
Exceptional work demonstrating a very high degree of understanding, creativity and criticality.
Demonstrates exceptional judgement based on arguments consistently supported by relevant literature. Logical, nuanced and complex argument presented.
Demonstrates a creative and critically engaged command of the literature and context that enables new contributions to knowledge.
Completed to a very high degree of accuracy, proficiency and autonomy. Exceptional communication and expression with evidence of professional skill set.
|
First
70 to 79%
|
Excellent research well beyond the minimum recommended using a range of methodologies.
Excellent understanding of knowledge and subject-specific theories and concepts with evidence of
|
Excellent analytical skills. Insightful and perceptive analysis demonstrating both the depth and breadth of the issues with excellent examples.
Excellent integration of theory into practice.
|
Excellent work clearly evidencing understanding, creativity and criticality.
Demonstrates coherent argument and interpretation consistently supported by relevant literature. Logical, nuanced and complex argument presented.
|
|
considerable originality and autonomy.
Excellent arguments, nuanced and well supported by a variety of literature.
|
Clear evidence of problem-solving skills and an excellent ability to apply learning resources.
Demonstrates creativity, originality and autonomy.
|
Demonstrates an excellent creative and critically engaged command of the literature and context.
Completed with accuracy, proficiency and considerable autonomy. Excellent communication and expression with some evidence of professional skill set.
|
Upper Second
60 to 69%
|
Very good understanding of knowledge and subject-specific theories and concepts with some originality and autonomy.
Thorough research, using established methodologies accurately, beyond the recommended minimum with little, if any, irrelevant material present.
Very good arguments, nuanced and well supported by a variety of literature.
|
Very good analytical skills. Analysis demonstrating both the breadth and depth of the issues. Well chosen, well justified and insightful examples provided.
Very good integration of theory into practice.
Demonstrates some originality, creativity and problem-solving skills and a very good application of learning resources.
|
Very good work demonstrating strong understanding of theories, concepts and issues with clear evidence of criticality.
Demonstrates coherent, substantiated, supported argument and interpretation. Logical and nuanced argument presented.
Demonstrates a very good creative and critically engaged command of the literature and context. Sense is made of the issues identified with the support of relevant literature.
Completed with accuracy, proficiency and autonomy. Very good communication and expression with evidence of professional skill set.
|
Lower Second
50 to 59%
|
Good understanding of knowledge and subject-specific theories and concepts with indications of originality and autonomy.
Good arguments well supported by a variety of literature.
Research undertaken accurately using established methodologies and drawing on a good range of relevant literature. Enquiry beyond that recommended may be present.
Some errors may be present and some inclusion of irrelevant material.
|
Good analytical skills. Analysis demonstrating both the breadth and depth of the issues. Well chosen, well justified examples provided.
Good integration of theory into practice.
Demonstrates some originality, creativity and problem-solving skills though with inconsistencies. A good ability to apply learning resources.
|
Good understanding of relevant theories, concepts and issues with some criticality.
Demonstrates logical argument and interpretation with supporting evidence.
Demonstrates a good creative and critically engaged command of the literature and context. Consistent attempts to make sense of the issues identified with the support of relevant literatures.
Expression and presentation mostly accurate, proficient, and conducted with some autonomy. Good communication and expression with appropriate professional skill set.
|
|
|
|
|
Third
40 to 49%
|
Research scope sufficient to evidence use of some established methodologies. Some irrelevant material likely to be present.
Demonstrates an understanding of knowledge and subject-specific theories sufficient to deal with concepts.
Arguments supported by a variety of literature.
|
Adequate levels of analysis demonstrated but with some lapses into descriptions or practice. Adequate number and/or depth of examples provided.
Adequate use of theory to makes sense of practice.
Demonstrates some originality, creativity and problem-solving skills but with inconsistencies. A basic ability to apply learning resources.
|
Meets the learning outcomes with a basic understanding of relevant theories, concepts and issues.
Demonstrates the ability to devise and sustain an argument with a basic level of criticality.
Adequate logic but argument can sometimes be difficult to follow.
Some evidence of a creative and critically engaged command of the literature and context. Adequate attempt to make sense of the issues identified with the support of relevant literatures.
Expression and presentation sufficient for accuracy and proficiency. Sufficient communication and expression with basic professional skill
|
Fail
30 to 39%
|
Learning outcomes not met.
Little evidence of research and use of established methodologies.
Demonstrates a weak knowledge and understanding of key theories and concepts.
Minimal references to relevant literatures leading to unsupported assertions.
Some relevant material present.
|
Learning outcomes not met.
Deficiencies evident in analysis with undeveloped examples provided.
Weak links between theory and practice.
Very limited originality, creativity and struggles with problem solving skills.
Limited ability to apply learning resources.
|
Learning outcomes not met.
Very limited understanding of relevant theories and concepts.
Arguments are weak and poorly constructed. Many unsupported assertions and judgements made.
Lacks evidence of a creative and critically engaged command of the literature and context.
Fundamental errors and some misunderstanding likely to be present.
Expression and presentation insufficient for accuracy and proficiency. Insufficient communication and expression and with deficiencies in professional skill set.
|
Fail
0 to 29%
|
Learning outcomes not met.
Minimal evidence of research and use of established methodologies and incomplete knowledge of the area.
Limited evidence of reading.
Demonstrates an inadequate knowledge of key theories and concepts.
|
Learning outcomes not met.
No analysis but descriptive. Irrelevant or obscure examples provided.
Minimal to no links between theory and practice.
Little evidence of originality, creativity and problem-solving skills.
Little evidence of ability to apply learning resources.
|
Learning outcomes not met.
Clear failure demonstrating little understanding of relevant theories, concepts and issues.
Arguments are very weak with no evidence of alternative view.
No evidence of a creative and critically engaged command of the literature and context.
Serious and fundamental aspects missing.
Expression and presentation deficient for accuracy and proficiency. Insufficient communication and expression and with deficiencies in professional skill set.
|
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions