How will my assignment be marked?
|
Your assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations and the criteria on the following page. You can use them to evaluate your own work and consider your grade before you submit.
|
|
3rd Class – 40-49%
|
Lower 2nd – 50-59%
|
Upper 2nd – 60-69%
|
1st Class – 70%+
|
DEMONSTRATING A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF THE SUBJECT (30%)
|
SATISFACTORY
IDENTIFIES AND UNDERSTANDS FEW OF THE ISSUES
ONE OR MORE SUBJECT MATTERS OR TOPICS WERE NOT ADDRESSED.
INFORMATION HAS LITTLE OR NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MAIN TOPIC.
|
GOOD
IDENTIFIES AND UNDERSTANDS SOME OF THE ISSUES
ALL SUBJECT MATTERS IN THE TITLE OR TOPIC ARE ADDRESSED. INFORMATION FAIRLY RELATES TO THE MAIN TOPIC BUT NO DISCUSSION AND DETAILS AND / OR EXAMPLES ARE GIVEN.
|
VERY GOOD
IDENTIFIES AND UNDERSTANDS MOST OF THE MAIN ISSUES.
ALL SUBJECT MATTERS IN THE TITLE OR TOPIC ARE ADDRESSED. INFORMATION CLEARLY RELATED TO THE MAIN TOPIC BUT WITH MINIMUM DISCUSSION. IT ONLY PROVIDES 1 - 2 SUPPORTING DETAILS AND / OR EXAMPLES.
|
EXCELLENT
IDENTIFIES AND UNDERSTANDS ALL OF THE MAIN ISSUES.
ALL SUBJECT MATTERS IN THE TITLE OR TOPIC ARE ADDRESSED. INFORMATION CLEARLY AND STRONGLY RELATES TO THE MAIN TOPIC WITH ADEQUATE DISCUSSION. IT INCLUDES SEVERAL SUPPORTING DETAILS AND / OR EXAMPLES.
|
MARKETING APPLICATION AND INTEGRATION OF LITERATURE
(30%)
|
SATISFACTORY
MARKETING INSIGHT & APPLICATION.
BREADTH, DEPTH & INTEGRATION OF LITERATURE/EXAMPLES INTO WORK IS APPROPRIATE, BUT NOT CONSISTENTLY APPLIED.
|
GOOD
INSIGHT & APPLICATION.
BREADTH, DEPTH & INTEGRATION OF LITERATURE/EXAMPLES INTO WORK IS APPROPRIATE TO THE CONTEXT AND ATTEMPTS TO BE CONSISTENT.
|
VERY GOOD
MARKETING INSIGHT & APPLICATION.
BREADTH, DEPTH & INTEGRATION OF LITERATURE/EXAMPLES INTO WORK IS ABOVE AVERAGE.
|
EXCELLENT
MARKETING INSIGHT & APPLICATION.
BREADTH, DEPTH & INTEGRATION OF LITERATURE/EXAMPLES INTO WORK IS IMPRESSIVE.
|
DISCUSSION
/ANALYSIS /CRITICAL EVALUATION &/OR REFLECTION
(30%)
|
SATISFACTORY
BASIC EVIDENCE OF DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS/ CRITICAL EVALUATION &/OR REFLECTION BUT SOME POINTS SUPERFICIALLY MADE SO NEED FURTHER DEVELOPMENT. LIMITED CRITICAL EVALUATION (MAINLY DESCRIPTIVE)
|
GOOD
LEVEL OF DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS/ CRITICAL EVALUATION &/OR REFLECTION BUT MORE IDEAS/POINTS COULD BE ADDRESSED
DEVELOPED FURTHER.
|
VERY GOOD
LEVEL OF DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS/ CRITICAL EVALUATION &/OR REFLECTION & A FEW IDEAS/POINTS COULD BENEFIT FROM FURTHER DEVELOPMENT &/OR EVALUATION/COMPARISON.
|
EXCELLENT
LEVEL OF DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS/ CRITICAL EVALUATION &/OR REFLECTION DEVELOPING POINTS IN THE APPROPRIATE WAY WITH THOROUGH CONSIDERATION OF ALL POSSIBILITIES.
THE BEST WORK WILL BE HIGHLY DEVELOPED AND FOCUSED AND ATTEMPT A HOLISTIC TREATMENT OF THE TASK/PROBLEM.
|
PRESENTATION STYLE AND STRUCTURE
(10%)
|
SATISFACTORY
BASIC STRUCTURE.
NOT ALWAYS WRITTEN CLEARLY & HAS GRAMMATICAL & / OR SPELLING ERRORS.
|
GOOD
CLEAR PRESENTATION & STRUCTURE. WRITING IS MAINLY CLEAR BUT SOME SPELLING &/ OR GRAMMATICAL ERRORS.
|
VERY GOOD
PRESENTATION & STRUCTURE, PARAGRAPHING, FLUENT ACADEMIC WRITING STYLE.
VERY FEW GRAMMATICAL ERRORS & SPELLING MISTAKES.
|
EXCELLENT
PRESENTATION & STRUCTURE. ARTICULATE & FLUENT ACADEMIC WRITING STYLE. ONLY A MINOR ERROR.
|